Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

has anyone seen Lawrence O'Donnell since 10/22?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 09:17 PM
Original message
has anyone seen Lawrence O'Donnell since 10/22?
He's disappeared from MSNBC, I think, after his gratifying but perhaps career ending spot on Scarborough on 10/22 when he called Swifty O'Neill a liar nearly 50 times.

Have there been any sightings? Do we need to write MSNBC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's the same place Col. David Hackworth is, off the corporate air.
I think O'Donnell has earned a place in history. He was the first person on corporate media to tell the truth, shout it from the rooftops so to speak. I remember when Hackworth referred to some finance show weasel as a 'chicken hawk' on CNBC. Never saw him again on corporate media. Tut, tut, don't tell the truth and, especially, don't tell it too loud with too much passion.

A big "Fuck Off" to the Corporate Media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And Julianne Malveaux....
When was the last time you saw her on TV??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whalerider55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. and howdy doody
haven't seen that little wooden repug since the early sixties.

whalerider55
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
30. Good point on Malveaux...also the inimitable "doody" guy.
My wife was actually removed from the "Howdy Doody" set for throwing a tantrum when she was 7. She HASN'T been on television since, either! Ah, the Corporate Media (not 'main stream', not 'liberal'...it's Corporate Media)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. I liked Lawrence! We should hire him to anchor the new liberal Fox equiva
lent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. That would be nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. I didn't care for Hackworth that much but I noticed
that the networks had him on more when Clinton was in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
31. You would have changed your mind if you heard him on Iraq.
Edited on Mon Dec-06-04 02:56 AM by autorank
cat_girl25, He was opposed to the war and said so in no uncertain terms. Corporate Media can't handle that. Check out his site and click on "Calling General Abazaid." You'll love it.

http://www.hackworth.com/

This guy is kicking ass and taking names.

PS. Are there actually 'cat_girl's 1-24?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. He was brilliant that day, wasn't he?
I think he was the best thing I've ever seen on TV. So, I wrote to MSNBC and told them he was wonderful and he should have his own show. Never heard back from them. I was shocked. Shocked, I tell you.

Of course he's disappeared. His honesty and fearlessness scared the corporate suckasses.

This is why I quit watching TV.

Except for the Dylan interview tonight on "Sixty Minutes."

Which was great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. He acted like an asshole, just like Paula Zahn did earlier
I didn't care when Paula Zahn berated and interrupted Hafiz al-Mirazi, Al-Jazeera's Washington Bureau Chief, shortly after WTC attack when he dared to link the 9/11 attacks to US foreign policy in the Middle East.

Lawrence O'Donnell gave the same idiotic performance as Zahn, all the while presenting himself as a MSNBC analyst when in fact he was clearly partisan. What O'Donnell should have done is what Keith Olbermann does which is to point out inconsistencies in the claims made by his guest. Berating and abusing the person being interview is the sort fascist tactics that Bill O'Reilly likes to indulge in. That's not a trait that I am about to endorse regardless of the person doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. He called a spade a spade.Oneil is a liar.Pat Buchanan didn't challenge JO
so LO'D did. Oneil is outrageous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackangrydem Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. Zahn was the interviewer, O'Donnell was not
O'Donnell and O'Neil were representing opposing viewpoints. Pat Buchanan was the host/moderator. Debates often become heated, Buchanan should have done a better job as moderator once O'Donnell began to rant. That was his responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. O'Donnell would have been effective had he not ranted and raved
His role was that of MSNBC analyst, a far cry from being an advocate against O'Neil. O'Donnell hurt no one but himself, and by resorting to insults he failed to rebut O'Neil's bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
44. Agreed...as much as I had empathy for what he felt....
..it was lost in his unprofessional behavior. I think it actually hurt his message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. I also wrote MSNBC applauding his 'honesty.' Never heard back.
Though I kept re-playing that segment. It was soooo cathartic to watch. And come to think of it, even though O'Donnell was 'canned'... the networks news shows really seemed to 'back off' after that with the Swiftboat lie story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ebayfool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. I wrote MSNBC as well. I don't care if it was 'out of line', ...
I was friggin' thrilled to just hear somebody, ANYBODY, finally say the 'L' word! Danced all over the house laughing & crying, very undignified for a decorous grammy! I decided on the spot that O'Donnell was the most honest man in America - gawd, I love him! (in a dignified, decorous, grammy sorta way, course)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. He was on The McLaughlin Group post-election.
He wasn't taking any prisoners, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. I saw that.
And remember him saying that if those gay marriage amendments had not been on those ballots John Kerry would be the new Prez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. And the Dem ticket should have supported full civil rights for gays!
That's means marriage equality with heteros!

By not fighting for principle, Kerry-Edwards surrendered the issue to the GOP, just like they did on the war in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. I enjoy O'Donnell on the McLaughlin Group.
I've seen him post-election, but not in the last few weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. but he hasn't been back since.
He was pissed.

I miss him on that panel......poor Eleanor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh my-I haven't seen him keep me posted
I no longer watch Hardlies or any of that-but he was on the Mcglouhin group on PBS-I haven't seen him there.

The media in this country is a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. They must have been "Tombstoned." (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. I didn't even see much..
...fuss in the media gossip. Usually there will be some discussion of the "sins" of someone who's in trouble for speaking too freely. Don't recall seeing Mastah Kurtz chat about this episode. Nor FOX's News Watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. So the Chicken Noodle Network bounced O'Donnell, but kept
The Traitor? I'm shocked, I tell you. Shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It was on MSNBC.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. He might be with that therapy group in Florida.
Still screaming liar! liar! I could certainly sympathize. Imagine sitting with all those assholes on the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pukin Dog Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. Disgraceful
Lawrence O'Donnell, should be fired from MSNBC. His performance was a disgrace. Instead of using facts to challenge O'Neill, he crassly resorted to name-calling. He hurt the cause because viewers probably believed that there were no facts to dispute the "Swifties." He also gave further ammunition to the charge that liberals do not agree in free speech unless you agree with them. I was appalled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Hold the RW pukes to your standard and we have a deal.
They do the same and lie outright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. the facts HAVE been used but the ignore it which is WHY
O'Donnell lost it.

the media whores and right wingers ignore the fucking facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. speaking of pukin'
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Interesting first post
What Lawrence O'Donnell did is nothing worse than what I've seen Sean Hannity do. Was it the perfect response? No, but it was needed after corporate media gave John O'Neill a full month to attack John Kerry with lies. Even once it was completely clear that he and his buddies were lying, corporate media continued to have him on shows right up until the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. The Kerry campaign should have called him a "liar"....
He did no thave one claim that was backed up by the documents. Anybody else would have been kicked ut on their ear but O'Neil got to spew his partisan right-wing bullshi for a whole month w/o a response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-04 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I agree
Edited on Sun Dec-05-04 11:39 PM by high density
Shrum and Cahill were assuming that the press would do some fact checking on the issue. Not surprisingly, that didn't happen because the press was waiting for Kerry to issue a sound bite. Later we learned that Kerry wanted to respond directly but he was advised against doing so. Outside of a few op-ed pieces on Kerry's side from people who really knew what happened, it seems the only major piece of fact checking came from "Nightline." This "Nightline" piece got little, if any, air time after its initial broadcast, and it was far too late to make a difference anyway.

I'll never understand why the Kerry campaign didn't wise up and respond after the first few days. Shrum and Cahill should have been well aware that the contemporary TV media doesn't act as a filter for the truth, they just air "both sides" and let the idiot masses decide who they want to believe. Without Kerry talking, the only side being represented was the one of the Swift Boat F--ks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #22
36. The first word in your paragraph sums up nicely why Kerry lost
"Shrum"

Kerry could have won the election. Speech writers like Shrum should stick to what they do best.

Speaking of the media, your second paragraph is spot on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
41. To be fair, the press DID do some fact-checking.
The Washington Post (of which I am no fan) ran at least one front-page article about what really happened in Vietnam, and the accounts generally supported Kerry and of course the Navy's decision to award him the various medals.

The Post also ran an article on how one of the people (if I may call them that) in the Swift Boat attack ads was an advisor on the Bush campaign. In addition, the profiled that crazy officer (was it Roy Hoffman? I forget) who helped start all this. The article wasn't particularly sympathetic.

The New York Times did an actual chart showing the Bush-Rove links to the Swift Boat attack group.

Of course, all that is the kind of stuff we at DU might read (I said might). Meanwhile, the pieces of human filth like O'Neill were on the airwaves 24/7, and gullible guys who buy the macho fantasies put out by the GOP were snapping up copies of "Unfit for Command." So the power of the SBVFT grew.

I'll tell you this: The SBVFT are planning to stick around and harrass Kerry further. They said as much to a reporter for The Hill newspaper in DC. We have got to make sure that these whoreson liars do not get away with this dishonor a second time. How do we marginalize/discredit this bunch? Suggestions?

As for John O'Neill, hanging, drawing and quartering is a good deal too gentle a fate for him. He's probably going to share Nixon's cell in the afterlife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. There is nothing stopping Kerry from suing them for slander
Why hasn't he? If he wants to run again, he better sue them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. It was the same thing as what Bill O'Reilly does
and equally inappropriate!

If you act like the repukes, you become the repukes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
vol5516 Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
38. implosion
I've not seen him anywhere since his psychotic break on Scarborough!!Ranting and raving and screaming doesn't make it, although if he was in Fl, we cpould have probably Baker Acted him!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
40. Stop your whining! Check out our new spokesman.



Pictured above: The Inimitable Undertaker and Mankind, a Dem, roughing up The Rock, a Republic.

Makes O'Donnell look mild. I'm tired of seeing our people take crap from liars and try to be reasonable.

It's time to kick out the jams.


Corporate America controls the media and we get manufactured news.
Corporate America now controls the voting machines and we get manufactured elections.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Autorank: Sorry for responding so late....
"He was opposed to the war and said so in no uncertain terms. Corporate Media can't handle that. Check out his site and click on "Calling General Abazaid." You'll love it."

Oh, I am sure he kicked ass. The reason I said I didn't care for him is because he criticized Clinton a lot (but maybe not that much). But that's okay, nothing wrong with criticism, at least he didn't trash the guy day in and day out. I just hate that he isn't on the tv a lot trashing Geedubya (who no doubt warrants the trashing) but I know it's not his fault.


"PS. Are there actually 'cat_girl's 1-24?"

It just may be....24 girls on DU that love cats but that is not why my id is cat_girl...cat is short for Catherine.:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Thank God! One less cat nut on DU! I'll remember "25."
Hey, who knows, if Gore's cable network gets up and running, they can give him a show. He was anti war from the start. Great thread!

CORPORATE AMERICA controls the media and we get MANUFACTURED NEWS.
CORPORATE AMERICA now controls the voting machines and we get MANUFACTURED ELECTIONS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC