Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hackworth: Uncle Sam Wants Your Kids - Now!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 09:59 PM
Original message
Hackworth: Uncle Sam Wants Your Kids - Now!
Uncle Sam Wants Your Kids – Now!

http://www.sftt.org/cgi-bin/csNews/csNews.cgi?database=Hacks
%20Target%20Homepage.db&command=viewone&op=t&id=95&rnd=98.
6165388701079

(Sorry about the link line. Its just that long.) :+

By David H. Hackworth

We’ll soon have 150,000 U.S. troops stuck in the ever-expanding Iraqi quagmire, a number that will probably grow even larger before Iraq holds elections presently scheduled for the end of January ’05.
Maintaining such a force is a logistical and personnel nightmare for every grunt in Iraq. And according to several Pentagon number crunchers, it’s also driving the top brass bonkers.

Meanwhile the insurgents continue cutting our supply lines and whacking our fighting platoons and supporters, who attrit daily as soldiers and Marines fall to enemy shots, sickness or accidents. Empty platoons lose fights, so these casualties have to be replaced ASAP.
Since this tragic war kicked off in March 2003, the United States has evacuated an estimated 50,000 KIA, WIA and non-battle casualties from Iraq back to the States – leaving 50,000 slots that have had to be filled.

The job of finding fresh bodies to keep our units topped off falls mainly to the Army Recruiting Command. But the “making-quota” jazz put out by the Recruiting Command and the Pentagon to hype their billion-dollar recruiting effort, with its huge TV expenditure and big expansion of recruiters during the past year, is pure unadulterated spin. Not that this is anything new. The Command has a sorry reputation for using smoke and mirrors to cover up poor performance.

“Hack, here’s a snapshot of how little of our 1st Quarter mission has been achieved,” says an Army recruiter. “Look at it from a perspective of a business releasing quarterly earnings information. To keep unit manning levels up out in the field, especially in Iraq, there’s no question our recruiting mission is in serious trouble.”

“These are totals for the 41 USAREC (Recruiting Command) Battalions, so these stats represent the USAREC mission accomplishment:

Regular Army Volume (all RA contracts):

Mission: 25,322

Achieved: 12,703 (50.17 percent)

Army Reserve Volume:

Mission: 7,373

Achieved: 3,206 (43.48 percent).”

The Army National Guard is faring no better. A Guard retention NCO says: “The word is out on the streets of Washington, D.C. ‘Do not join the Guard.’ I see these words echoing right across the U.S.A.”

By the end of this recruiting year, the Regular Army, Reserves and Guard could fall short more than 50 percent of its projected requirement, or about 60,000 new soldiers. And according to many recruiters, quality recruits are giving way to mental midgets who have a hard time telling their left foot from their right.

Shades of our last years in Vietnam.

SNIP!

“I believe the Army will have to drastically change what they offer to enlistees to overcome what’s happening in Iraq. The war is ugly, and not many kids want to enlist to be blown up.”

Moms and dads are outraged about desperate Army recruiters on a relentless campaign to sign up their teenagers. High-school kids are actually running away from recruiters like they were George Romero’s living dead.

“Recruiters have called my son a minimum of 20 times in the two years since he finished high school,” a dad reports. “The phone calls usually come in clusters. I answered five calls in a two- or three-week span. Each time a recruiter calls, he receives the same polite, respectful response from me or my son ... no interest, and please take the name off the list. When asked why the name hasn’t been removed, excuses are made. While recruiters are brief with me, when my son is on the phone, the sales tactics are clever, prolonged and very high-pressure.”

“I took the latest recruiting call. This time I also called the supervisor at the local Army recruiting office, who’s promised to take his name off the list. She made excuses for the repeated calls despite the fact that five calls were on her watch.”

Unless a miracle happens and the new Iraqi security force decides to stop running and start fighting, we’ll be in Iraq for a long time. Most likely with a draftee force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Keep this post kicked up!
:kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Col. Hackworth used to be one of FAUX News' biggest Busheep cheerleaders.
Good to see that some conservatives are finding their brains. Too bad it couldn't have happened soon enough to Diebold-proof the election :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good article but
you should edit it down to 4 paragraphs' worth. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. One of my students, a very capable and creative guy in his
sixties, told me and another student (a young Iraq War vet) about this site today. So it's timely that you should mention it.

Hackworth is no slouch. He probably has more military experience than just about anyone.

He has his own site, I believe--hackworth.com.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Told a poster a couple of days ago
that had said there would definitely "Not be a draft" to look in on Hackworth's column. I send people to www.hackworth.com. That gets them to SFTT and Hack's column.
I did have to point out to him that Hackworth almost certainly had more and better contacts in the in the active, reserve and retired military, among both officers and enlisted, than the poster or Don Rumsfeld.
Off topic Roguevalley, but soon I'm heading out of this dreadful S. Arizona weather to Gold Hill, Klamath Falls and up to Eugene to work on my tan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. HA!
I have family in Oregon. You'll arrive just in time for the SUNNY weather... ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks for the pointer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. What do they do when they institute a draft,
and the kids still tell them to fuck off? That's what
happened in VietNam. Contrary to the bullshit, this was
a far more partiotic nation then than it is now.

Or maybe it's just that the govenment shoved the war down
our throats instead of convincing us it was a necessary
and proper war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC