Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the "Party of Responsibility" is brilliant against the Bush Admin?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 05:34 PM
Original message
Why the "Party of Responsibility" is brilliant against the Bush Admin?
Edited on Thu Dec-09-04 06:02 PM by Pirate Smile
On Wednesday, Howard Dean said

"There is a Party of fiscal responsibility... economic responsibility.... social responsibility... civic responsibility... personal responsibility... and moral responsibility.
It's the Democratic Party.

We need to be able to say strongly, firmly, and proudly what we believe.

Because we are what we believe."

One reason this framing of the issue would be extremely effective for the Democratic Party is because BushCo. has made a conscious decision to never admit a mistake, i.e. take responsibility.

According to Jay Dickerson (WH correspondent) on Al Franken today, BushCo. would rather be viewed as stubborn then deal with the follow up questions to admitting a mistake.

There are so many screw-ups that they simply refuse to admit, thereby denying reality, that they look like they are living in an alternative universe.

I really think we can use this to our advantage if we make it part of our mantra, our talking points. It could also be applied to any new issues that come up - there is no limit on its shelf life.

What do you guys think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. I love it.
Dean's been saying that for a long time. And it's true.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dean was the man and he's still the man. Got a link? I'd like to
read the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Link below:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Thanks, NYCGirl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Traveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dean refuses to compromise his beliefs
The essence of integrity.

The Democratic Party needs a new thesis to express its traditional aims. I have long held that we should lock Dean and Clark in a hotel suite together for six months. Provide them with a staff of researchers and necessary technical support. Between the two of them there isn't a policy area they could not approach. I think the results would be amazing, and achievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny Noshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good idear
That's the ticket - fix the damn voting machines so we don't get screwed again - Dean/Clark 08 or Clark/Dean 08 and away we go.

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely,the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
-- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirAmFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Love your Mencken quote. The next Prez should put it on the plaque
under Dubya's portrait in the White House!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Remembering Deans speech from yesterday and hearing Dickerson's
comments about how BushCo. is willing to put up with any flack they get for not admitting a mistake makes this seem like an awesome strategy.

We have seen them do this repeatedly and regardless of how obvious the mistake was, they just get defensive. They look like complete assholes.

Let's please put them in that corner as much as possible - and throw darts at them.

Geez, we should run positive ads promoting the Democratic Party as the Party of Responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. I love the responsibility theme
I wish Kerry's campaign had embraced it. It would have been a perfect critique of the Bush administration and a perfect case for the Democratic Party.

And Kerry, who was always best when he was arguing national security or issues where the Bush folks were CLEARLY irresponsible, would have been a great messenger for it, had he embraced it.

For that matter, I think Dean could have done well, too. Who knows. Personally, I think Dean would still have come up short, but we'll never know, and I don't really feel like playing hypotheticals, especially when there are so many pros and cons to each candidate.

But I really applaud what Dean's been saying, and I say this as a strong Kerry supporter who never backed Dean for President (unless he'd been the nominee, of course).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, I have no interest in revisiting those battles either. I am looking
Edited on Thu Dec-09-04 07:15 PM by Pirate Smile
completely at the future.

I edited the subject line to take Dean's name out of it because I didn't mean for this thread to be on Dean. I wanted to talk about the framing of the issue, the strategy of the Bush Administration and the strategy we should take in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny Noshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Agreed
Refighting old battles is a waste of time - we have too much work to do now.

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely,the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
-- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's a beginning

Good tactic, but it's not enough as a strategy.

Look at the swing voters that went to Bush. Polling shows they liked all the Democratic domestic policy positions and even think that Democrats running the country would do a lot better of a job. But they voted the other way because of problems trusting Democrats and the sense that there was an overriding concern. We've already won the "responsibility" battle- and it's not the thing that is decisive.

One great problem is internal to the Party, and it is the latent conservatives and mere power-centrism that is- or: is easily construed as- unregenerateness or corruption. Once these folks change or no longer exert the control they do, the forming of the Modern Party that The People expects/demands is possible and Democratic credibility/principle is reestablished.

The second great problem is this long-running problematic involvement in the Middle East since ~1948. Everyone knows the present affair in Iraq is yet another horrid and bungled chapter of it by now, but Democrats haven't been able to present The People with a comprehensive analysis/attitude/plan about how to turn things around- how that whole set of conflicts and problems has to be resolved. We all "know" what the solution in I/P will need to be, and what must be in Iraq, but we can't seem to get to where all the parts of the Middle Eastern problem unify into an approach and plausibly achievable resolution.

Bush won those swing voters because they couldn't see Democrats changing things as carefully and drastically as is required domestically because the Party hasn't changed enough (Reason 1), and because the Middle East is still a long term American conflict zone (Reason 2).

I like to think Dean and the DLC could mutually annihilate each other, solving our internal problems with both of them :-) . The Middle Eastern problem is someone else's to solve, not Dean's.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I've thought the problem is people don't know what we stand for or that
we have any conviction about fighting for what we believe (at least the "Party" as an institution).

We discuss things like a bunch of policy proposals without tying the policy to moral convictions such as the immorality of children not being able to see a doctor when they are sick.

We haven't developed that part of our arguments well enough. We all know it is there and discuss it together but I guess we haven't been successful enough at relaying it to the not-yet-convinced people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kick
Does a flame war have to start in order for there to be a discussion.

OK - well, yo momma wears combat boots.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny Noshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Oh no
not the combat boots bit :)

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely,the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
-- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I've never really got that one. What would be so bad about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny Noshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Nothing
I never understood the supposed insult either. I was just joking about it being an old bit :D

"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely,the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
-- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Califooyah Operative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's exactly the strategy we should be taking, responsibility
ties in perfectly with dem values, and even cuts into the middleground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. They are dumping everything onto future generations - how completely
irresponsible.

Yet, Bush will use the argument "we can't pass this problem onto our children" when it suits his purposes - completely disingenuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC