LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 06:24 PM
Original message |
Why pick Dean instead of LaRouche for DNC chair? |
|
- LaRouche is better at getting people to contribute money than Dean is. It used to be LaRouche leading in individual contributions before it was Dean - a real people-powered candidate. - You say Dean is confrontative? I say hogwash compared to LaRouche. Does Dean print pages and pages of attack against the Republicans? Has Dean ever had his own publishing company? Does this seem to say that Dean isn't as concerned about reaching the people? - Have you heard Dean ever even mention PNAC? And even if so, how often? LaRouche talks about it all the time. Isn't "hiding" it through obscurity furthering it's goals? - The DNC won't even let LaRouche run for president, and they've been losing elections, making it obvious that we need to put LaRouche in a leadership position, or lose another election.
NOTE: This entire post is sarcastic except for this part.
|
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message |
|
hehe
But hey, since Dean was leading in the poll of DNC delegates doesn't that make Dean the insider? Or did Dean become the establishment insider when much of the party establishment endorsed him for President? This is a little confusing. I thought everyone was supposed to be against Dean.
|
imenja
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Sure, if your plan is the end of the party |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-09-04 06:30 PM by imenja
then Larouche is your ideal candidate. I cannot begin to find the words to express how insane this idea is.
Edit: didn't realize it was a joke until I read the fine print. Sorry
|
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message |
3. We had spaghetti three times... |
NoPasaran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I haven't had spaghetti in ages |
|
Mind if I come over some time?
|
roguevalley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message |
5. LaRouche is a convicted criminal and a crack pot. Has been forever |
|
but whatever you want. LaRouche would be like Perot. The kiss of death.
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Kiss of death? FACT: We lost the last election. |
|
FACT: LaRouche was not our candidate, and was not even allowed to run.
This losing strategy needs to go. It is so obvious.
|
yankeedem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. That's what they said about *, here we are, 4 years later |
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-09-04 06:48 PM by bowens43
On Edit: the fine print gets you every time!!
You got me.
|
Lydia Leftcoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-09-04 07:33 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Oh, good grief, that's the same line Carlos used against Kucinich! |
|
zzzz
I didn't support Dean in the primaries, but he or someone much like him is exactly what we need as DNC chair.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:11 PM
Response to Original message |