Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon official backs sexual assault policy recommendations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:48 PM
Original message
Pentagon official backs sexual assault policy recommendations
Pentagon official backs sexual assault policy recommendations

By Daniel Pulliam
dpulliam@govexec.com

Sexual assault policy recommendations from a committee advising the Defense Department were generally accepted by a top military leader Friday as the Pentagon moves closer to reforming policies that many have described as outdated.

David Chu, undersecretary of Defense for personnel and readiness, said the recommendations were substantive, and many should be implemented through the Pentagon's Joint Task Force on Sexual Assault Prevention and Response by the end of the year.

The recommendations from the Defense Department Advisory Committee on Women in the Services included codifying the zero tolerance policy on sexual assault in a department directive, similar to the Army's policy released in April. The committee also strongly advocated that a clear definition of sexual assault be incorporated into the Uniformed Code of Military Justice and disseminated by the task force.

The panel is not recommending the adoption of a civilian definition of sexual assault, rather, they want the definition of sexual assault used in training to be enforced consistently through the UCMJ. Chu said the approach is interesting because "there's a lot of pressure to conform to civil code."

http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/1204/121004p1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Guarionex Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm confused...
is this a good thing or bad thing?

If they are cracking down on sexual assault inside the armed forces...GOOD.

But, am I missing something here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Any step in the right direction is good
The question is, could it be better or was it comprhensive enough to achieve the goal? I just put it out there are general news from govexec.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC