Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The way the south votes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ms_Mary Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 09:53 AM
Original message
The way the south votes
The south has gotten a horrible rap for this election, but we were far from the worst Bush area. If you look at us here, we aren't red, we're purple.If we work on it, we could be blue next time.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, you see that
little bit of purplish blue in North Texas. That is me and a handful of friends and family. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Electoral votes are cast on a statewide basis
individual counties do not count. The South was Bush's best region of the country and he got some of his highest % in Southern states. There are a few southern states worth pursuing, but for the most part we should write it off and look west.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms_Mary Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Did you LOOK at the midwest?
Bright freakin red. I realize there are fewer electoral votes there, but there are a lot of southern states that weren't Bush by that much.

This site breaks it down several ways: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/

Write it off? What exactly is that supposed to accomplish? Give you a smaller Democratic base with no chance of taking southern states? Bush did not win the entire south by a landslide and that means that a heck of a lot of us are really unhappy and wanted a change. A lot of us are getting even more vocal and perfectly wiling to bust our asses for the cause. Use that to your advangtage. I don't get the elitist, defeatist attitude. We'll never win that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Which states went for Bush in the south by less than 10 points?
Florida, Arkansas and Virginia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. I'm not saying we should spend resources in SD, ND, NE, KS
either, nor am I saying we should write off ALL southern states. But some states are not going to be within reach anytime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms_Mary Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Okay, it's hard to tell from a general statement. I can live w/that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms_Mary Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's really short-sighted to discount the south's democratic vote
because the counties are where the state's vote comes from and that's what makes the electoral vote. You strenghten the blue, you can turn the tide. You write it off and where do you plan on finding the electoral votes needed to win? Not the midwest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. With a Growing Hispanic Population...
...and the probability that **'s incompetence will come to bite the r's in the rear end, compliant media or no compliant media, I agree with you about looking west.

I think that our best bets are New Mexico (voted Clinton twice and for Gore), Nevada (Clinton twice), Arizona and Colorado (each voted for Clinton once). That's a combined 29 electoral votes. Getting Ohio, Iowa, Misouri and West Virginia back in addition would make for a very comfortable Democratic EV victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. Look at the Mississippi River from about St. Louis south
And the Texas counties along the Mexican border and the blue swath across central Alabama and across central South Carolina and eastern North Carolina.

Then look at eastern Oregon and eastern Washington, most of Ohio, western Pennsylvania, southern Illinois, etc.

Which of those areas should be cultivated and which should be written off?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. We've carried oregon and washington regularly
look at the whole state, not selected counties. Alabama, Mississippi, South Carolina are not the best states to waste resources in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merbex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. I like your positive thinking
I agree, the South doesn't look so bad in this light.I wish this map had the outline of the states superimposed on it so we could actually see what each state looked like rather than by region.

Oklahoma,Kansas and Nebraska LOOK DISMAL as does Utah if my 5th grade geography lessons hold up after- ahem -35 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC