Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

("Dissident groups" seek) Delay sought in Ohio electoral vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 03:31 PM
Original message
("Dissident groups" seek) Delay sought in Ohio electoral vote
declare a new winner
or throw out the results, but in any case,
stop the Electoral College delegation's vote until their case can be decided
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/13/ohio.electoralcollege.ap/index.html

Delay sought in Ohio electoral vote
Monday, December 13, 2004 Posted: 1:01 PM EST (1801 GMT)

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) -- Dissident groups asked the Ohio Supreme Court on Monday to review the outcome of the state's presidential race, hours before the Ohio delegation to the Electoral College was to cast ballots for president and vice president.

The groups question whether President Bush won the key swing state by 119,000 votes, guaranteeing his victory over Democrat John Kerry.

The Rev. Jesse Jackson and attorney Cliff Arnebeck of the Massachusetts-based Alliance for Democracy accused President Bush's campaign of "high-tech vote stealing."

Jackson said the challengers noticed Bush generally received more votes in counties that use optical-scan voting machines and questioned whether the machines were calibrated to record votes for Bush.

The dissidents claim there were disparities in vote totals for Democrats, too few voting machines in Democrat-leaning precincts, organized campaigns directing voters to the wrong polling place and confusion over the counting of provisional ballots by voters whose names did not appear in the records at polling places.
<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Today a dissident, tomorrow an insurgent!
bah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yuugal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dissidents?
LOL. We haven't been branded that way since the 70's! We must be making progress after all. Can we still be commie-sympathizers to?

"""The dissidents claim there were disparities in vote totals for Democrats, too few voting machines in Democrat-leaning precincts, organized campaigns directing voters to the wrong polling place and confusion over the counting of provisional ballots by voters whose names did not appear in the records at polling places.""""

And we all know you can't trust what those commie-luving, pinko, socialist, values-hating, dissidents say! I'd read the whole article but I try not to click on CNN links before dinner. Bad for the digestion.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwantmycountryback Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dissidents!
How Stalinist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The big lie assumes they are the majority - as Diebold made it so
It's what the word is meant to mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiosyncratic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have written to CNN, ABC, MSNBC, and CBS
telling them the word is wrong. I asked, in one of the letters, if they got it from Karl Rove, since all of them are using the same term.

SHEESH!! Don't they use a thesaurus. Do they all have to parrot the same term.

Patriotic Americans who want to make sure every vote is counted should not be called "dissidents." I don't think we should allow this to stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-04 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The C-Span editor will not discuss not sending a crew to Conyers
hearing today.

(Most Cable carry only C-Span, not C-Span2, and I understand they may put at least part of the hearing on C-Span2)

I think Bush has ordered a National Media shutdown!

I must remember that they hate us for our freedoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC