Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US media; why the freeping rightwingnuts are so ignorant.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 11:41 PM
Original message
US media; why the freeping rightwingnuts are so ignorant.
The Stupid:

Three of Four Bush Supporters Still Believe in Iraqi WMD, al Qaeda Ties

http://www.globalexchange.org/countries/iraq/2613.html

And WHY are so many so Stupid?

In Iraq Crisis, Networks Are Megaphones for Official Views

Among the major findings in a two-week study (1/30/03=2/12/03) of on-camera network news sources quoted on Iraq:

-Seventy-six percent of all sources were current or former officials, leaving little room for independent and grassroots views. Similarly, 75 percent of U.S. sources (199/267) were current or former officials.

-At a time when 61 percent of U.S. respondents were telling pollsters that more time was needed for diplomacy and inspections (2/6/03), only 6 percent of U.S. sources on the four networks were skeptics regarding the need for war.

-Sources affiliated with anti-war activism were nearly non-existent. On the four networks combined, just three of 393 sources were identified as being affiliated with anti-war activism-- less than 1 percent. Just one of 267 U.S. sources was affiliated with anti-war activism-- less than half a percent.

More than two-thirds (267 out of 393) of the guests featured were from the United States. Of the U.S. guests, a striking 75 percent (199) were either current or former government or military officials. Only one of the official U.S. sources expressed skepticism or opposition to the war.

http://www.fair.org/reports/iraq-sources.html

Study: Misperceptions About Iraq War Contributed to Support For It

A majority of Americans have held at least one of three mistaken impressions about the U.S.-led war in Iraq, according to a new study released Thursday, and those misperceptions contributed to much of the popular support for the war.

The three common mistaken impressions are that:

-U.S. forces found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

-There's clear evidence that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein worked closely with the Sept. 11 terrorists.

-People in foreign countries generally either backed the U.S.-led war or were evenly split between supporting and opposing it.

In fact, no weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq. U.S. intelligence has found no clear evidence that Saddam was working closely with al-Qaida or was involved in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Gallup polls found large majorities opposed to the war in most countries.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/1003-08.htm

ONE MORE TIME for the stupid freeping rightwingnuts; Iraq had NOTHING TO DO with 911; Iraq had NO WMD since 1991 (and your bush-god has admitted this publicly, you ignorant morons) Iraq had NO TIES to al Qaeda or any other international terrorist organization; the world DID NOT and DOES NOT support bush's invasion of Iraq.

So PLEASE dear freepingly stupid rightwingnuts; inform yourselves, and THEN do your goose-stepping brownshirting bush-apologist rhetoric, using FACTS as your base of argument. It's DAMNED DIFFICULT to do anything but laugh at you morons when you go on about Iraq's "wmd" and "threat" and "world support".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LearnedHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-04 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent rant!
I read that FAIR report a couple of months ago. It made me mad, but it also made me feel hopeless. Those who control the information are those who have total control.

Jeeeeezus, where's ol' Ben Franklin when we need him! (Come to think of it, the internet is what's taken the place of Ben's publishings -- what were they called?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UL_Approved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You are right
The Internet will bring this mess down. We just have to keep ourselves focused and dig. This is redundant, but I feel that the RW nuts need to hear this.

Information is being posted without revision or false premise.

Video newscasts have been taken of the Neo-con leadership which show massive contradiction.

Economic and political ties exist between "terrorists" and your own RW leadership.

And besides, if you militant fools really gave a shit about freedom, you wouldn't be sitting here in the U.S. trying to remove yourselves from paying for this war. You would either be over there in the sand, or you would be trying to give as much money to the war as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Right-Wingers will never accept the truth of what's really...
...going down, either in Iraq or here in America.
To see the world as it truly is would mean that they would have to see Bush and his Gang for what they are....Just another group of liars, crooks and manipulators ....They would then have to blame themselves for putting such trash in public office and (ala Humphrey Bogart):
"Sveetheart..That ain't gonna' happen"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC