Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Look to Colorado to dispel reports of Dems' premature demise

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 12:13 PM
Original message
Look to Colorado to dispel reports of Dems' premature demise
Edited on Wed Dec-15-04 12:14 PM by IrateCitizen
The following article was on today's Alternet.org. It gives an excellent synopsis of the tremendous gains that Democrats made in Colorado this year, in spite of the state going for Bush.

What (Good Things) Happened in Colorado?
By Rick Ridder, AlterNet. Posted December 15, 2004.

A political strategist explains why Democrats in Colorado cleaned the Republicans clocks on Nov. 2.


I read with interest, and perhaps a bit of bemusement, outgoing Colorado Senate President John Andrews’ explanation in the Weekly Standard for why the Republican Party of Colorado suffered major losses — a U.S. Senate seat, a Congressional seat, and both the State Senate and House — in November. “Why did a state so reliably red for so long – a state that's gone Republican in seven of eight presidential races since I came here from the Nixon White House in 1974,” Andrews asks, “vote deep blue all down the ticket below Bush-Cheney?” Andrews rightly ascribes the Democratic success to the failure of the Republican Party to offer a positive agenda and the extraordinary funding capabilities of the Democrats. But those two elements were only a small part of the reason for the Democratic success.

So what did Senator Andrews miss? Statewide victories for the Democrats in traditionally Republican states were not the norm in this election, so it makes sense for everyone to take a look at what happened in Colorado. Here are some reasons for why the Democrats did so well:

1.) Change vs. stay the same – The past two years there has been little more than bad news coming forth from the State Capitol. Insufficient education funding, torpid job growth, on-going state budget fiscal crises, rising health care costs and reductions in benefits all led to an environment where voters were seeking a change.

2.) Salazar – Ken Salazar exemplified the attributes voters sought. His Senate campaign stressed his personal values — hard work, commitment to family and Western roots and ethics — and successes as Attorney General on local and state issues. These provided an overarching thematic for the Colorado Democratic Party. In contrast to John Kerry, Salazar, in large part because of his background as Attorney General, was perceived as the candidate who was better on issues related to terrorism and personal safety. In suburban counties Salazar outpaced Kerry by significant margins and based on the exit polling data ran eight percent ahead of Kerry among women; “security moms” voted for Ken Salazar but not John Kerry. The Democrat was the safe choice.

READ THE REST HERE: http://www.alternet.org/election04/20757/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. And Montana - New D Governor, D Legislature
Go west, old party, go west!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, Montana Dems made major strides this year as well!
Perhaps most important to notice is that in these races, the "God, guns and gays" issues didn't even play a part, because the Democrats ran by addressing real issues that affected the residents of these states in a populist framework that emphasized fairness and common-sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. We need to look at the gains
made in these mountain states to get an idea of how to improve on the federal level.

Granted, this may be because the local candidates are more in tune with their constituents, but I think there is some potential in these states for national elections as well.

I think gun control has hurt to a large extent, but I think it's mostly a dead issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Every single school bond election passed.
People here believe schools do deserve more money. But the RW legislature has been stalling and blocking every attempt. Now that our hands are tied with a tax-limiting measure (TABOR) and a growth limiting initiative (Arveschoug-Byrd amendment), even the Dems can't fix the problem alone.

We'll be filing an adequacy based school funding lawsuit in the next few months. Watch for more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
F.Gordon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Go West Young Man/Woman
I heard on Franken, didn't know this, that the only County in Wyoming that went Democratic was Cheney's home county.

This is why I go "postal" when I see the "fraud" finger pointed at Colorado. Zogby was very focused on our state before the Election. Very good things happened here, and they will continue.

Thanks for posting this IC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC