Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How to talk to a pro-lifer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Lenape85 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 11:39 AM
Original message
How to talk to a pro-lifer
Well, Decision 2004 has been decided and the illegit president wins with a 51% margin (that is according to the machines). One of the reasons that could have propelled him over the top was the abortion issue. It tends to be a very sensitive issue, turning even McGovern Democrats into red dog republicans. It has made many people in the South and Great Plains vote against their own economic interests.

But, does the Republican party really care about abortion.

In the election following Roe V. Wade, which was in 1976, the abortion issue was rarely or never mentioned. Jimmy Carter had never really established himself either way and he still won the South. Then of course came Reagan, an abortion foe, who brought it center stage. He was the president who saw the pro-life movement grow.

As much as Reagan talked the talk about being pro-life, did he even do anything about it.

Although he did tap Scarface for the Supreme Court, this was not before he considered pro-choice Sandra Day O'Connor to be on the supreme court, to which Jerry Falwell said "Every good christian ought to be concerned". However, Mr. Falwell would probably still respect Reagan greatly today.

Take this other example, George Herbert Walker Bush. Although he did appoint Clarence Thomas to the Supremes, he also hired David Souter.

Now, I know that had Sandra Day O'Connor or David Souter been rejected in favour of anti-choicers, we might have seen a repeal of Roe V. Wade right when Clinton came to office (the court would have been Rehnquist, Thomas, Scalia, pro-lifer, pro-lifer).

Fast forward to 2000. The pro-birth people were riled over Clinton's presidency, and GW Bush "abortion foe" came out and passed all sorts of restrictions on abortion.

But all of these actions were just to throw the anti-choice movement a bone. Which poses this question? Do Republicans REALLY care about abortion.

Let's face it, if they didn't adopt some kind of "moral" platform, they would have nothing to run on; the new economy would just seem too repulsive to support. However, they played the "values matter most" card, and they were able to get their reforms passed.

And they will keep throwing the anti-choicers a few bones, but they should not count on supposedly "moral" candidates to stop abortion on demand, because if they did, then they would lose one of the most established wedge issues.

You should tell all your "pro-life" friends that Republicans do not care about the abortion issue, because if they did, they might not just use it as a smokescreen to pass policies that allow the rich to get richer and the poor to get poorer. Always remember that if one of their daughters gets pregnant with an unwanted child, they will probably send their little darling to an abortion cline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. The truth is there's far less pro-lifers than you think.
Polls seem to consistenly show around 60% support for pro-choice. That's WHY Repugs only talk tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. of course they don't give a shit. and...
Edited on Fri Dec-17-04 11:51 AM by tk2kewl
outlawing it would cause a backlash that would throw them all out of office. a large majority of americans want abortion to remain legal. its just that the minority is energized and active while the majority is not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Repealing Roe V Wade would be
the worst thing to happen to the republican party.

(and pretty bad for the country too)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MemphisTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. The repubs dangle this carrot of repealing Roe v. Wade
to keep their base of religious right strong. They have no intention of doing anything about abortion. Bush has said that it is not at the top of his agenda. Apparently his Man-date is. (still laughing at that one) But they will eventually play this abortion card too much and anger the fundies. However, I do think this is the reason the gay marriage issue is so important to the repubs. This gives them and alternate wedge issue. Not bad strategery on the part of Bushco. He'll have the fundies eating out of his had for years to come because they are blinded by these two issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rniel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. First don't call them "pro life"
How about "anti-choice"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Correct!
We have got to stop letting these bastards hijack the language!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC