Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Getting labels correct: Is health care for all Americans moderate or lib?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 04:42 PM
Original message
Poll question: Getting labels correct: Is health care for all Americans moderate or lib?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
parkenyc Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. It should be moderate, but it is considered liberal.
Corporations receive bailouts from the government, but giving the people, whose tax dollars fund the corporate bailout, health insurance is viewed as socialist.

I think health care should be available to ALL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Only by those who don't want it.
They label things liberal as an excuse to avoid making them reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parkenyc Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. As a way to avoid paying for them.
People in Congress have excellent government provided healthcare. We the taxpayers who pay for that, do not have it for ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. My thoughts exactly
Are you residing in my brain? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
St. Jarvitude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why even bother with those labels?
Health care for all Americans is common sense. It's morally right. It's compassionate. It's caring. It's humane. It's the right thing to do.

It's not a matter of being liberal, moderate, or "conservative." If you don't support health care for all Americans, you are not a human being, and you can get the fuck off my planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Health care for all Americans is beyond labels,
It's simply common fucking sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. The Only Debate Is How We Get There....
I like the French system better than the Canadian system... Universal health care for all and if you want added services you have to pay for it.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Maybe if we define common sense as liberalism
people will stop voting for conservatives. It worked the other way around for Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Moderates and liberals support healthcare for everyone. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Health Care"? Or "Government paid and managed health care"?
One is moderate... the other is liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Rather spend billions on healthcare than a foreign fiasco. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Sure! Except health care is "Trillions"... not "Billions". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Okay, then don't borrow trillions to privatize SS then either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. OK by me! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. US Gov spends more money per capita on health care than any nation
but everyone isn't covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Every industrialized nation is liberal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. By US standards? You bet! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. neither. It's a progressive issue
I think progressives should take it as OUR issue and run with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prairierose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think it's a human issue...
we are the only industialized nation that does not have health care for all our citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Conservative
You'd think conservatives would want to conserve the health of the population of citizens, workers and voters, wouldn't you?

I guess they only want to conserve corporate profits and the lifestyles of the super wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. But if they don't pay attention to the health
of the workers that provide those corporate profits they won't last long. Between killing off the next generation of labor in wars of exapansionism and killing off those at home because they can't afford health care, how will the money machine continue to grind?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
32. no, they'll just outsource the work to countries which do have
government sponsored health care--the corporations dont' have to pay for health coverage and they don't have to pay the workers as much.

They could care less that the labor pool is drying up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. it, too, is sensible :)
i'm really digging this word. it encompasses all, crossing boundaries, while also isolating other opinions (because they are wrong :evilgrin:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. both
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's basically a socialist idea
just like social security was first advanced by socialists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BernieBear Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. Depends on how it's implemented
If it's a government sponsered program for everyone, a la Great Britian it's liberal.

If it's a choice of competitive plans with some sort of subsidy or credit based on income need, etc. then it's moderate.

BB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. other than the US and i think 1 or 2 nations, every industrialized nation
Edited on Fri Dec-17-04 06:32 PM by sonicx
has universal health care. In Canada, i read that even the Conservative Party supports it (of course, if they were in power, that tune would change).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Exactly
The response to universal health care depends entirely on the details of its implementation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. agreed.
It's effectiveness does as well. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. I could not vote ..... no category for "The Right Thing to Do"
Why must something so fundamentally correct in a nation such as ours - to say nothing of the entire planet - have a label?

There is not one person on the entire planet who isn't simply **entitled** to health care. Who among us shall be the first to be turned away?

We can argue the "how". We can politicize the "how". But no human being can ever argue the "what" without being inhuman. Its that simple.

Maybe a restating of the poll question is order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
28. Very business friendly across the board, so moderate.
It would save businesses of all sizes from the expense of providing health insurance benefits completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
31. It's truly the most 'pro-life' one can be
pro life and pro-quality-of-life.

In order to enjoy one's constitutional right to 'pursuit of happiness', one needs to be healthy.

ergo...

Denying healthcare to all Americans is unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC