Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Would Happen To Time Mag If ......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 11:48 AM
Original message
What Would Happen To Time Mag If ......
Edited on Sun Dec-19-04 11:52 AM by global1
all non* supporters cancelled their subscription? It's TIME we took it to the MSM and "Time" Magazine is a good one to make and example of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. it won't happen
for the same reason that democrats still appear on fox
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. How Many DUer's do we have that would cancel? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. sorry - if I had a subscription, I would cancel it.
but the cover photo - :puke:

bush, in the company of FDR and Churchill?!?!? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. I have a subscription.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. I recently dropped my subscription to Time and US New & World Report
...after reading their election coverage ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kuozzman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Did you know that * supporters think that Time only named him POY so
they can point out the bad things he did this year? (Since POY isn't necessarily an "award". It just means the person impacted the world a lot.) I find that pretty absurd, but apparently many * supporters think the MSM is anti-*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Dr Ron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. No big deal...He joins Hitler
Time's person of the year is the person with the most impact--for good or evil. Hitler also won it. Bush is in good company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Stalin won it twice, didn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Infamy
Bush will be on the cover and it will be a bad thing for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Stalin won in 37 and Hitler in 38. And Bin Laden was the choice for 2001
Osama was only pulled at the 11th hour because the "award" generally IS seen as complimentary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Did Saddam win a couple of years ago or maybe it was OBL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Ron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. "Tribute" To the Person of the Year Posted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm keeping my subscription
I hate to see Bush on the cover of anything but "person of the year" is not an endorsement. Bush has created the largest deficit in our history, his tax cuts if made permanant as planned will create a tremendous gap between our wealthiest and poorest citizens. He has corrupted politics by his lies and mislead the American people. He has been a divisive figure worldwide and thrives on his ability to divide people. He invaded two contries, killed numerous noncombatants and may have created another Iran from Iraq. His policy of pre-emptive war has set coutries on edge and is aiding nuclear expansion.

Bush had certainly had an impact, much like previous individuals such as Hitler and Stalin and runner ups like Bin Laden.

According to Time, the winner must be “the person or persons who most affected the news and our lives, for good or for ill, and embodied what was important about the year, for better or for worse,” he said.

American aviator Charles Lindbergh was Time’s first “Man of the Year” in 1927. Some selections have been notoriously unpopular, such as Adolf Hitler in 1938, Joseph Stalin in 1939 and 1942, and Iran’s Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979.

I'll wait and see what the magazine says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. You'll wait and see what the "Rag" says????
Face it, you hold a subcription to a magazine involved in bullsh*t propaganda in America's own "1984" storyline.....

Time Magazine is owned by Time-Warner, who also owns CNN who is part of the cable cartel that fixed our primaries, trashed Kerry and protected their native son, Bush to this day.

Guess the election is over and Time-Warner (parent Co. of CNN) has settled on paying the SEC 510 Million dollars as a settlement stemming from the Income Stock/advertising AOL fraud case that the Gov. has been hanging over their heads for the last 1.5 years.

The selection of Bush as Person of the Year is probably the difference between Time-Warner paying 510 million vs. 4 billion for the fraud it committed. Costly deal...but what's a multinational media corporation to do when the Governmnet has you by the balls?

To be honest, I don't give a rat's ass that Time Magazine selected *; nor what Time Magazine thinks; nor what they report. It's all bullshit and propaganda anyways. I'll leave it up to the Sheeples to find this "person of the year" turd food to be interesting and thought provoking.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/latimests/2004 ...
Time Warner Settles AOL Fraud Charges
Thu Dec 16, 7:55 AM ET
Media giant Time Warner Inc. agreed Wednesday to pay $510 million to settle government charges of accounting fraud at its troubled America Online unit, freeing the company to use its stock for acquisitions.

settlement would remove the uncertainty clouding the future of the world's largest entertainment company accused by regulators of inflating the advertising revenue of its Internet service provider.

Wall Street had been expecting a deal, because Time Warner set aside $500 million last month to resolve problems with the government. Time Warner stock has climbed more than 15% since.

The two-pronged agreement would be with both the Justice Department (news - web sites) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (news -web sites). It must be approved by SEC commissioners.

Wall Street analysts had been prepared a year ago for the accounting debacle to cost Time Warner as much as $4 billion in penalties and litigation. But Chief Executive Richard Parsons took a hard stance with regulators, refusing to admit guilt even though that might have more quickly resolved the investigations.


MORE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. The title is, in ignorance, assumed to be an honor.
There was a massive public backlash in the United States after TIME named Ayatollah Khomeini Man of the Year in 1979. Since then, TIME has often shied away from choosing overly controversial candidates. TIME's Person of the Year 2001 — in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks — was New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani. It was a somewhat controversial result; many thought that Giuliani was deserving, but also many thought that the rules of selection ("the individual or group of individuals who have had the biggest effect on the year's news") made the obvious choice Osama bin Laden. They cited previous choices such as Adolf Hitler demonstrating that Man of the Year did not necessarily mean "Best Human Being of the Year".

1927- Charles Lindbergh
1928- Walter Chrysler
1929- Owen Young
1930- Mahatma Gandhi
1931- Pierre Laval
1932- Franklin Delano Roosevelt
1933- Hugh Johnson
1934- Franklin Delano Roosevelt (2nd time)
1935- Haile Selassie
1936- Wallis Simpson
1937- Chiang Kai-Shek and Soong May-ling
1938- Adolf Hitler
1939- Joseph Stalin
1940- Winston Churchill
1941- Franklin Delano Roosevelt (3rd time)
1942- Joseph Stalin (2nd time)
1943- George Marshall
1944- Dwight Eisenhower
1945- Harry Truman
1946- James F. Byrnes
1947- George Marshall (2nd time)
1948- Harry Truman (2nd time)
1949- Winston Churchill (2nd time)
1950- The American Fighting-Man
1951- Mohammed Mossadegh
1952- Queen Elizabeth II
1953- Konrad Adenauer
1954- John Dulles
1955- Harlow Curtice
1956- Hungarian Freedom Fighter
1957- Nikita Khrushchev
1958- Charles De Gaulle
1959- Dwight Eisenhower (2nd time)
1960- U.S. scientists
1961- John F. Kennedy
1962- Pope John XXIII
1963- Martin Luther King Jr.
1964- Lyndon Johnson
1965- William Westmoreland
1966- Twenty-Five and Under
1967- Lyndon Johnson (2nd time)
1968- Frank Borman, Jim Lovell, William Anders
1969- The Middle Americans
1970- Willy Brandt
1971- Richard Nixon
1972- Richard Nixon (2nd time) and Henry Kissinger
1973- John Sirica
1974- King Faisal
1975- American Women
1976- Jimmy Carter
1977- Anwar Sadat
1978- Deng Xiaoping
1979- Ayatollah Khomeini
1980- Ronald Reagan
1981- Lech Walesa
1982- The Computer
1983- Ronald Reagan (2nd time) and Yuri Andropov
1984- Peter Ueberroth
1985- Deng Xiaoping (2nd time)
1986- Corazon Aquino
1987- Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev
1988- Endangered Earth ("Planet of the Year")
1989- Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev (2nd time)
1990- George H. W. Bush
1991- Ted Turner
1992- Bill Clinton
1993- Nelson Mandela, F.W. de Klerk, Yasser Arafat, and Yitzhak Rabin
1994- Pope John Paul II
1995- Newt Gingrich
1996- David Ho
1997- Andy Grove
1998- Bill Clinton (2nd time) and Kenneth Starr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC