Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

* Statement on new Security Act- He's creating his own "security agency"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:13 PM
Original message
* Statement on new Security Act- He's creating his own "security agency"
Edited on Sun Dec-19-04 04:44 PM by Capn Sunshine
I am completely STUNNED that there was NO extensive media coverage of this brash assumption of "New executive power"- It's beyond belief he is this blatant. :scared; We're so screwed. Read it carefully!
-----------------------------------------
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
December 17, 2004

Statement by the President




December 17, 2004

STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT

Today, I have signed into law S. 2845, the "Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004" (the "Act"). The Act strengthens the intelligence and counterterrorism capabilities of the United States, including by appropriate implementation of the recommendations in the Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, often called the 9/11 Commission.

Many provisions of the Act deal with the conduct of United States intelligence activities and the defense of the Nation, which are two of the most important functions of the Presidency. The executive branch shall construe the Act, including amendments made by the Act, in a manner consistent with the constitutional authority of the President to conduct the Nation's foreign relations, as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, and to supervise the unitary executive branch, which encompass the authority to conduct intelligence operations.

The executive branch shall construe provisions in the Act that mandate submission of information to the Congress, entities within or outside the executive branch, or the public, in a manner consistent with the President's constitutional authority to supervise the unitary executive branch and to withhold infor-mation that could impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, or the performance of the Executive's constitutional duties. Such provisions include sections 1022, 1061, 3001(f)(4), 5201, 5403(e), and 8403, and sections 101A(f) and 102A©(7) of the National Security Act of 1947 as amended by sections 1011 and 1031, section 703(b), 704, and 706(f) of the Public Interest Declassification Act of 2000 as amended by section 1102, section 601 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 as amended by section 6002, section 207 of the Afghan Freedom Support Act of 2002 as amended by section 7104, section 112(b) of title 1, United States Code, as amended by section 7120, and section 878 of the Homeland Security Act as amended by section 7407.

To the extent that provisions of the Act purport to require or regulate submission by executive branch officials of legis-lative recommendations to the Congress, the executive branch shall construe such provisions in a manner consistent with the President's constitutional authority to supervise the unitary executive branch and to submit for congressional consideration such measures as the President judges necessary and expedient. Such provisions include sections 1094, 1095, 4012(b), 4019, 5201, 6303, 6403, 7119, 7208, 7213, 7502, 7802, 7803, and 8403©, section 119B(g) of the National Security Act of 1947 as amended by section 1023, and section 44925 of title 49, United States Code, as amended by section 4013. To the extent that provisions of the Act, including section 3001(g) and section 102A(e) of the National Security Act of 1947 as amended by section 1011, purport to require consultation with the Congress as a condition to execution of the law, the executive branch shall construe such provision as calling for, but not mandating, such consultation.

Several provisions of the Act, including Title III and section 7601, purport to regulate access to classified national security information. The Supreme Court of the United States has stated that the President's authority to classify and control access to informa-tion bearing on national security flows from the Constitution and does not depend upon a legislative grant of authority. The executive branch shall construe such provisions in a manner consistent with the Constitution's commitment to the President of the executive power, the power to conduct the Nation's foreign affairs, and the authority as Commander in Chief.

The executive branch shall construe as advisory provisions of the Act that purport to regulate the means by which the President obtains recommendations or information from subordinates in the executive branch, as is consistent with the constitutional commitment to the President of authority to supervise the unitary executive branch and to require the opinions of principal officers of executive departments. Such provisions include sections 103A(a), 103B(d), 106, 119(h), and 101A of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended by sections 1011, 1014, 1021, and 1031 of the Act.

The executive branch shall construe as advisory provisions of the Act that purport to require the conduct of negotiations with a foreign government or otherwise direct or burden the President's conduct of foreign relations, including sections 4026, 4072©(2), 5301 to the extent it involves foreign diplomats and other foreign officials, 7116, 7204, 7210, 7217, 7303©, and 7703, and sections 104(d) and 206(d)(1) of the Afghanistan Freedom Support Act as amended by section 7104. Further, the executive branch shall construe section 6(j)(5) of the Export Administration Act of 1979 as amended by section 7102© of the Act, to identify a non-exclusive factor for the Secretary of State to consider in his discretion in making determinations under subsection 6(j), as is consistent with the use of the non-exclusive term "include" in the provision and the congressional decision reflected in the text of the statute to afford the President substantial latitude in implementation of the provision.

The executive branch shall construe provisions of the Act that relate to race, ethnicity, or gender in a manner consistent with the requirement that the Federal Government afford equal protection of the laws under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.

GEORGE W. BUSH

THE WHITE HOUSE,

December 17, 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. i'm sorry, but i still have trouble not giggling when i read "bush"
and "intelligence" in the same sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Link? The press release is printed in full.
Edited on Sun Dec-19-04 04:38 PM by Capn Sunshine
?
Maybe Whitehouse.gov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cavanaghjam Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. He lays it right out there,
doesn't he?

"...the President's constitutional authority to supervise the unitary executive branch and to withhold infor-mation that could impair foreign relations, national security, the deliberative processes of the Executive, or the performance of the Executive's constitutional duties."

Can you say Patriot Act II?

So the president can deem whatever he wants as classified, keep it from congressional oversight, and any of actions he might take he can just say, "National security."

Gotta love this bit - "The executive branch shall construe provisions of the Act that relate to race, ethnicity, or gender in a manner consistent with the requirement that the Federal Government afford equal protection of the laws under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution." - meaning, "We won't discriminate when it comes to deprivation of information." EVERYONE shares equally in getting screwed.

Media are portraying either the three monkeys - blind, deaf and dumb - or Sgt. Schultz of Hogan's Heroes - "I know nothing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Damn scary, isn't?
I'm sure most people in the beltwway would say this is standard language, but I am deeply disturbed.

The national security state was already out of control-- a lawless and unconstitutional entity. And now it is even worse.

We need someone to shake these guys up-- some reporter with guts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Standard language?
Edited on Sun Dec-19-04 04:41 PM by Capn Sunshine
NO Executive has asserted the power to go around congress, have his own spy agency , and be unaccountable to congress on the grounds of "national security." Read it again. He's saying he gets his own little police force for the executive branch, responsible to no one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. This is standard for the CIA
they have gotten progressively more and more unaccountable over the years. And most presidents have put up with it because they like what the CIA does for them. Clearly Bush is asserting even more power than ever before, but I just know that this sort of language is not going to alarm or surprise any conventional (corrupt) beltway types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. This doesn't reference the CIA. It speaks to a NEW agency
responsible only to the President.
Office of special plans run amok.
But NOT the CIA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemOperative Donating Member (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. This IS scary
"Several provisions of the Act, including Title III and section 7601, purport to regulate access to classified national security information. The Supreme Court of the United States has stated that the President's authority to classify and control access to informa-tion bearing on national security flows from the Constitution and does not depend upon a legislative grant of authority."


Bush is saying "screw your new law, the president can conrol any information he sees fit to withhold," :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudbluestater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Welcome to our dictatorship
The coup is complete.

We need all new politicians, not just Republicans. The Democrats passed this bill as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC