indianablue
(558 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-20-04 04:56 PM
Original message |
How many Dems will vote for Social Security Reform? |
|
I bet more than you think.
Name them please..I have a few names but..i want to see some other opinions.
|
David Dunham
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-20-04 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I don't think many Dems will if we pressure them. |
stray cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-20-04 05:11 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Lets see what the bill looks like - then I will guess. |
Zinfandel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-20-04 05:12 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Reform?? Is to imply there is something wrong with it. |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-20-04 05:24 PM by Zinfandel
That's what they want us to believe, that's the way they use terminology, for the media to get us to think they are going to do something helpful, "reform"---when they absolutely want Social Security DESTROYED!!! Besides this republican administration stealing all the Social Security suplus...
Social Security has and is working, there is NO need to make any changes in Social Security.
If one wants to invest more for retirement...everyone is free to invest in a 401K and still have ones full SS benefits when they retire...And as many have stated (except the republicans & BushCo, who despise SS and have vowed to get rid of Social Security forever). SS is sound until at least 2042. I believe the non-partisan experts not the republican or other interested parties.
|
indianablue
(558 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-20-04 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I agree it does not need reform. |
Pepperbelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-20-04 05:24 PM
Response to Original message |
5. My state's senior Senator, Blanche Lincoln, who is very moderate, has ... |
|
already announced publicly her opposition to this measure and she did it passionately as well.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message |