Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So 48% approve of the job Bush is doing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 03:49 AM
Original message
So 48% approve of the job Bush is doing
while 49% disapprove....

This is a mandate, after a fairly close election

Suggestion....

Look at close races where the GOP came out on top for House seats and see how well bush did in the same seat. If Bush did less than 55% or got a lower rate than the congressperson, than letters should be written to the local papers about the congressman with Bush all over him as well....

Congressman X, even though he has a strong labor constituency, is choosing to side with Bush on gutting the overtime laws...

That kind of stuff that comes from real people.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. sorry but it is a mandate
after four year of incompentence, and * still wins that says everything

Not only that they control congress, and I wouldn't put my faith in the trash dems in congress to protect us.

during the first four year they gave * everything he asked for, and I have the upmost confidence they will do the same thing for his second term. Why?

1. They gave * the right to declare war on Iraq, when they should have assumed the responsibility

2. They allowed a fraudulent medicare drug bill to pass

3. They passed a 385 billion dollar budget which diminished roe v wade, reduced pell grants, and had tremendous pork

no a major cleaning up of the democratic party is needed, and I do not see that occurring soon

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That is why I think we should shift gears a little, as activist
and try to change the reapportionment boards before the next round of redistricting comes on line in 2011....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I hate redistricting so much
It inevitably turns into gerrymandering each time. It's illegal, so we don't see blatent examples, but what happens nowadays barely passes as legal. Historically, it's effects have been quite ugly if not downright unjust, especially with minority voters and the impoverished in general. I'd rather go on a proportional representation format instead. If a state has 10 seats in the House, for instance, then the seats would be apportioned according to how much each party won of the votes cast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC