Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mexican City Bans Indoor Nudity. next project for the Religiious Right?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
priapis Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 06:01 AM
Original message
Mexican City Bans Indoor Nudity. next project for the Religiious Right?
Mexican City Bans Indoor Nudity


Dec. 22, 2004 | Mexico City -- Alarmed by glimpses of sweaty citizens in the buff, the city council in the southeastern city of Villahermosa has adopted a law banning indoor nudity, officials confirmed Wednesday.

The regulation, which takes effect on Jan. 1, calls for as much as 36 hours in jail or a fine of 1,356 pesos ($121) for offenders in the Tabasco state capital, 410 miles east of Mexico City.


"We are talking about zero tolerance ... for a lack of morality," said city councilwoman Blanca Estela Pulido of the Revolutionary Institutional Party, which governs the state and city.

Opposition party councilman Rodrigo Sanchez said in an interview that the measure, part of a larger series of prohibitions, "tramples on the rights of the citizens by taking laughable measures such as contemplating penalties for citizens who walk around nude inside their houses."

"I have no idea how you detect the naked. You'd have to have a big operation to try to bring it under control," he added.

Pulido said she was confident that citizens who catch a glimpse of offenders would report them to police -- though the law also threatens jail for peeping Toms.

The city on the southern Gulf of Mexico is noted for its swelteringly hot, humid climate.

"The majority of houses have a lot of ventilation, and we give ourselves the luxury of going naked," Pulido said. "Because we walk past the windows, you see a lot of things."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
drhilarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. A good law...
There might be impressionable but god-fearing dust mites about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kiteflyer Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. All dogs and cats
should have to wear clothing too. Why not, they are part of the family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm not big on cats & dogs being dressed as I'm with cows and horses
along the hwy. Especially horses that are dragging their dong on the ground after having a woody.

Seriously, a politician tried to legislate a law in California a few years back to have the large animals along hwy's wear clothes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. So, do they have to go out on the lawn to have sex now?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. So what happens when they get caught? Drag them out and arrest them?
Good thinking as usual from the morality crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. is the Crisco Kid behind this?
i'm so glad Ashcroft is gone. He would love to be able to institute this law on a federal level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. That makes bathing tough
I guess one can wear a swimsuit, but it just isn't the same!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCeline69 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
8. D'oh!
Pulido said she was confident that citizens who catch a glimpse of offenders would report them to police -- though the law also threatens jail for peeping Toms.

Yossarian lives!
Anything not forbidden is compulsory...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wouldn't it have made more sense
to require everyone to have window shades?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. link, please
Do you have a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. It is a response to cult type nudists in area
large city...close, close living conditions..these are new to the city...so, just a way of saying...not in our town, thank you! Living so close to one another, families are not comfortable with these new cultists and the exposure to their families and small children..and the nudists are flaunting it as their right. This problem will quickly be solved...just the mexican way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC