Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld cannot be fired because....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:22 PM
Original message
Rumsfeld cannot be fired because....
that would be an admission of failure. A failure in Iraq. A failure in the "war on terror". A failure of George W Bush and this Administration. He is never going to be fired. Perhaps he will step down voluntarily at a better time of his choosing - like after the elections in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "no nonsense" ?
You've got to be kidding. Rumsfeld is all nonsense, all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madison2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. what country are you from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ufour20 Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. The troops support him?
I guess yu talked with ALL the troops and they told you this? the Sod also required competence, logic, thoughtfullness and listening, things he is well in short supply of. But then again, what the hell does he care if a few thousand grunts get killed -- as long as he an his PNAC buddies get their permanent base in Iraq, it's all good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. You must have seen the blurb on FOX?
The PR campaign to save Rummy's ass?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. tough and no nonsense? ROTFLMAO
you're too funny.

He doesn't have all that support from the troops. They know they are sitting ducks because he doesn't have a clue as to what he is doing.

Read what the real soldiers are saying.

http://www.optruth.org//main.cfm
http://www.veteransforpeace.org /
http://www.bringthemhomenow.org /
http://www.ivaw.net /
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Ha!
Good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Oh yeah, they love him.
Troops' motto: "We don't need no stinkin' armor, we need a Secretary of Defense who's a 'tough no-nonsense person.' Also a president who pretends he's a cowboy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. The troops hate Rumsfeld.
Including this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. BTW "The Military Veterans hate Rumsfeld TOO!"
Including this one. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. ROFL yeah right! the brass hates him, just do a google search on
"Rumsfeld generals disagree"

http://www.google.com/search?q=Rumsfeld+generals+disagree&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official

Times Online - Comment
... You don’t have to disagree with the war against Iraq ... Remind me what job you still
hold, Mr Rumsfeld? The Defence Secretary blamed his own generals (always a ...
www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,1071-1396798,00.html - Similar pages

Daily Kos: Brass turns on Rumsfeld
... confirmed Rumsfeld's view of Clintonite generals out of ... wildly off the mark'' and
Rumsfeld also disagreed ... that ''there are others'' who disagree, White concluded ...
www.dailykos.net/archives/002195.html - 14k - Cached - Similar pages

RightNation.US > Lawmakers Chide Rumsfeld for Auto-Signed Sympathy
... 11:24 AM. I'm assuming everyone here understands why Donald Rumsfeld is under ... I respect
Kristol, but I disagree with him and the several generals who may ...
www.rightnation.us/forums/ lofiversion/index.php/t63418.html - 22k - Cached - Similar pages

Rumsfeld to remain at Pentagon; Thompson resigns HHS post - 12/04 ...
... unusual for leaving all its top generals and civilian ... for Saturday, December 4, 2004;
Rumsfeld to remain ... State economists disagree on budget deficit numbers; Mich ...
www.detnews.com/2004/politics/ 0412/04/politics-23811.htm - 31k - Cached - Similar pages

Rumsfeld to remain at Pentagon; Thompson resigns HHS post - 12/04 ...
... for leaving all its top generals and civilian ... on medical marijuana; Rumsfeld to remain
at Pentagon ... to pass intelligence bill; State economists disagree on budget ...
www.detnews.com/2004/politics/ 0412/07/politics-23811.htm - 33k - Cached - Similar pages
< More results from www.detnews.com >

Joe Galloway: Army Shakeups Clear Path for Rumsfeld's Vision
... at war with the Army's top generals - veterans of ... a number of bruising encounters
with Rumsfeld, who Pentagon ... of publicly ridiculing those who disagree with him ...
www.military.com/NewContent/ 0,13190,Galloway_042603,00.html - 34k - Cached - Similar pages

Rumsfeld's Rules
... By Donald Rumsfeld. ... House links to members to be cut because they may disagree on
some ... asked, “Who do you consider to be the greatest generals?” He responded ...
www.analects-ink.com/weekend/020308.html - 101k - Cached - Similar pages

USATODAY.com - Rumsfeld's abrasive style sparks conflict
... that it would be risky to disagree with him. ... the secretaries make for top generals
and admirals. Even Rumsfeld's harshest critics grudgingly admit that he has ...
www.usatoday.com/news/washington/ 2002-12-09-1a-cover_x.htm - 61k - Cached - Similar pages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. Kudos to you! Excellent research ... good sources.
Edited on Mon Dec-27-04 05:47 PM by ElectroPrincess
As a former Military Intelligence Officer, I only know field grade friends and acquaintances who are still Active Duty. Unless my sources are out of the norm, there's NO love lost for Rummy.

The ole' "take no prisoners" and "hard ass" persona only appeals to nugs (new troops) and perhaps, the die hard lifers. Those older and more seasoned soldiers KNOW that Rumsfeld is pushing his own agenda ... "let military history and science be DAMNED!"

Brings a whole new and bizarre spin to the term "Neo-CON."

Bottom Line: Rumsfeld's a world class PNAC policy spewing a**hole. Too bad their tenets are based on pure fantasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. That's why Rummy had to pull a guy out of retirement ...
to be the Army Chief of Staff. Because the active duty generals supported him so much. LMAO !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Enjoy your "fishing"
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kill Radicalism Now Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Many troops do NOT support him
There are a few on sorryeverybody.com who said they voted for Kerry. The reason? Because with Bush they know they'll never come home.

Vietnam 2.

Rummy will never get fired. We need to impeach Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Jo March Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. I agree with the first part - he won't be fired
but the second part of your post isn't grounded in reality. The reality of it is that soliders have to respect the office, not the person who holds the office. They don't respect or support Rummy any more than they respect or support *. They just can't come right out and say that they don't support him.

Having been in the military, I can tell you that it is very political but the troops, although silent, aren't stupid. They know that the war was started on a lie and is underfunded and understaffed.

They don't support Rummy, although the MSM might have you believe otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Foolish place to go salmon fishing
I think you are fishing in the wrong waters. Most folks in here take Rumsfeld at his face value. A blustery overblown egomaniac. I would encourage you to fish elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. He's a wimp who could care less when folks die/kill for his mistakes. (nt)
Edited on Mon Dec-27-04 03:52 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. That's the funniest thing I've heard in a long time!
BWAHAHAHAHAHA! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. they NEVER admit even the slightest error
among other things, firing Rumsfailed would be a major admission of one of the biggest blunders in the history of US foreign policy.

They also can't fire him because things are going swimmingly well for them. Their actual agenda, which has nothing to do with "winning" a "war," is being fulfilled in spades--they've shifted several trillion dollars to the upper 1% for decades to come, they've preserved the power they seized in the coup of 2000, they have four more years to keep plundering the treasury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. but will he fall on his sword for his leader
after railing on those who are calling for him to step down and doing in for the "good" of the war effort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kill Radicalism Now Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. Oh but the White House says he's doing...
A superb job! Right along with the FDA. LOL LOL LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. maybe if they keep sending him to Iraq they will get lucky...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissBrooks Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. I heard that ..
when a President is re-selected, his entire cabinet resigns and he decides who to keep.

He then offers the ones he wants to stay their jobs again. That's why so many people are "resigning" now.

This "saves face" so he doesn't have to fire anyone...

Anyone know if this is true?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. very true
all president in resent history. Most keep the ones they want and respect the wishes of the ones that really want to go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissBrooks Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Cool - thanks.
Thanks for confirming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. Because he knows where all the bodies are buried.
He's part of the governing council. Fact, I think he pretty much runs our foreign affairs out of the Pentagon. I'll bet Condi gets a desk in his anteroom. He's a PNAC architect, afterall.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Bingo!
If they fire him they'll have to kill him.

Not that killing him would be a big deal to these thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. Rummy's one of the puppet masters.
He'll go down with the ship. Guaranteed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. because Bush is afraid to fire him
for one of two reasons:

1) Bush loses his only goat for the war. How many times have we seen Bush shoulder the blame for anything? Only when public sentiment about the war reaches an obscene low, will the chimp have the balls to fire him. He'll wait for a better time, like when he's completely out of excuses.

2) Rumsfeld has the goods on Bush. He gets fired and some bad things start coming to the surface about his ex-boss.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
26. Careful what you wish for:
Now I have never had confidence in Rumsfeld, but that puts me in two minds about getting rid of him. On one hand, it would be an honest move since he is a miserable failure. On the other hand, what effect would getting rid of him have?

Do we really believe for one nano second that bush would place a more competent person in that position? If so, why wasn’t it done along with this latest spate of resignations? I think we could look forward to more of the same with one caveat: everything that would and will go wrong will take the onus off of the resident. He could simply, as he regularly does, pass the buck; however, this time the buck would be passed on to those who opposed Rumsfeld. The new: “This wouldn’t be happening if the Democrats hadn’t forced us to get rid of Rummy” meme would only replace the current: “It’s all Clinton’s fault.”

No_I don’t rummy leaving as a plus. It just opens the door for the boy-king to take the high ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. WE NEED RUMMY....to stay in, not get fired or to quit. TRUST ME
on this. Rummy must stay to continue to eff up. I just don't want troops to pay for his screw ups with their lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
28. PNAC
He's completely in on the whole thing. Even Richard Perle (also a member) gets to have discussions with his former buddies.

As far as Rummy is concerned, they may need ANOTHER Pearl Harbor-type event to occur to get the next level of war to get public support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
32. Because Dick Cheney Knows Better Than to Let Bush Do It.
Rummy and Cheney, they run the show with Rice and Rove making it pretty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
35. because Rumsferato is the only one in Amerika that can make
Dubya look good by comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
37. possibly, but I doubt it
Rummy may be the easiest target left in the administration with Ashcroft resigning, but there is one thing Bush treasures and demands above all else, loyalty. That goes both ways as far as he is concerned so don't look to see one of his most loyal lapdogs leave unless things become totally unbearable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC