Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some questions on Presidential succession

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 10:26 AM
Original message
Some questions on Presidential succession
Bear with me a second, just for the sake of the argument.

Lets say the Repubs decide to run Cheney for President in 2008, and * as VP. While unusual, there is no prohibition in the Constitution.

Now, assuming they win, lets say about a month after swearing in Cheney decides to resign due to 'health reasons'. Plausible, he does have heart problems and all.

Could Bush assume the presidency again?

(We could switch this around and say Clinton runs for VP under someone elso if you like)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. no
sucession bounced over anyone unable to be president, as it does for the cabinet politions where the person isn't native born american.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Cheney could never carry an election
without bbv, blackwell and harris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaganPreacher Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes.
In theory, Cheney could run with W as VP, win the election, then resign, putting W back in the White House.

Before 2000, some on the right were afraid that Clinton/Gore would do that very thing.

In real terms, that would be such a transparent kingmaking ploy (on either side), that millions of Americans would oppose it, and such a candidacy would be dead in the water.



The Pagan Preacher
I don't turn the other cheek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spartan61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Actually yes and no.
The Constitution now says that a president can serve for 10 years, not 8 as so many believe. In other words, if someone who was VP, became president with only 2 years or less remaining as president, that former VP could run for office for two terms. However, if that person became president for more than two years, he/she could only run for one term. Ten years cannot be exceeded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC