Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone know which of the candidates oppose Yucca Mountain?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Albert Einstein Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 03:47 PM
Original message
Does anyone know which of the candidates oppose Yucca Mountain?
Edited on Mon Jan-17-05 03:48 PM by Albert Einstein
It's sad to see a bunch of adults talking as if there is something more important than the environment when the handling of the environment will determine whether the youth of America get a chance to grow up. In fact, there is something downright immoral about not putting the environment first.

Dean was one of the people pushing Yucca Mountain. Most of us in Southern California will have to decide between living and leaving the state if it is built. Does anyone know if one of the others candidates will stop it. Wellington Webb is an environmentalist. What is he willing to do to put a stop to Yucca?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kerry also was against Yucca Mountain
I am in So Cal and traveled to NV on the weekends to work for Kerry. Yucca Mountain was one of my big pushing points. I was surprised how many people in NV just didn't care about that issue at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is getting downright absurd
I understand that people hold certain issues to be sacrosant, and when a person is running for public office, where their decisions and vote determine policy, I can understand this kind of litmus test. I can also understand that the chair of the DNC should mirror, to some significant degree, the party platform, but whether or not a candidate for chair supports Yucca mountain is simply not a persuasive issue. Your post strikes me as someone grasping at reasons to oppose Dean. I don't get these types of posts. Don't like Dean? Why not just say so? If all you have against him is this, then that's not a good enough reason to reject him for this position. Personally, I don't see Dean as some savior of the left, but I do think his positives outweigh his negatives, and I think I have a pretty good understanding of the guy. I've lived in Vermont since the beginning of his political career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dean in 2003 on the issues.
On Energy & Oil: No new nuclear plants until waste disposal is safe
Q: Should we build more nuclear power plants?
A: We can not build any new nuclear power plants until we have a satisfactory way of disposing of the waste. At present, significant questions have been raised about the safety of Yucca Mountain, the disposal site in Nevada. Unless those safety questions are resolved Yucca cannot be opened and new plants must not be built.

Source: Concord Monitor / WashingtonPost.com on-line Q&A

He also changed his mind on NAFTA and fully explains why in his book. If you are sincere, buy the book. You Have the Power, released Sept. of last year. Good read.

He says when you run for national office you must not just look out for your own state, you must think nationally.

But I doubt you would agree with that, you would rather argue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. And he accused the Kerry campaign of flip-flopping?
Which of his positions are we to believe. His candidate conversion or his use of his office to push and back Yucca Mountain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. So you want a leader who is "resolute" like Bush and never changes?
Gotcha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great post. You're right. I apologize for the ignorance of my genaration
To fail to make the environment our number one concern shows that we don't care about future generations. No wonder young people are re-registering as Republicans. What's the difference -except for the Kucinich's and Webb's and Kerry's and Kennedy's. Those Democrats who do not consider this the number one issue need to look at their own children and ask why their children's lives mean less to them than a temporary popular fad. The Democratic Party needs to be the Party that stands up for the environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wesley Clark
"I am against the nuke dump at Yucca Mountain, period. I will use the full force of the presidency to kill this dangerous project, which would put the lives and health of Nevadans at risk for generations."

- January 14 2004

(since Kerry was posted above and he is not running, either)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Great position. Too bad he turned down the chairmanship.
I like a person who has the courage to stand up like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
webjamn Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Question
Where are we going to store all the nuclear waste? I fear for the environment as much as anyone else but the fact remains that we need a permanent storage for our nuclear waste. It will remain radioactive for thousands of years and must be stored in a very secure and safe place. If not Yucca Mountain, where?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC