trof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-20-05 11:29 AM
Original message |
Why is Jimmy Carter at the coronation? |
NYCGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-20-05 11:29 AM
Response to Original message |
1. He's a former president. That's why. NT |
trof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-20-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
skylarmae
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-20-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Is Clinton going to be there? |
NYCGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-20-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. I believe he is there. NT |
4MoreYearsOfHell
(943 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-20-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message |
ThorsHammer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-20-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message |
3. As a former President, he probably still has respect for the office |
rkc3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-20-05 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. Remember how the right portrayed him as a bitter old man after the DNC? |
|
Since then, every time I hear him speak or hear about the things he's done since his presidency - my fucking blood boils.
Here's a guy approaching 90 (forgive me if I'm wrong about that point) and still is active in world politics, his church, his family -still loves his wife like the day he met her - and these guys say this about him.
Aside from sitting on boards of directors or trying not to shit their diapers - what has any repub president done in his retirement? Can any one tell me what one good thing Reagan or bush 1 did after retirement?
|
Wabbajack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-20-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-20-05 11:39 AM by Wabbajack
He'd be at the protest not standing with *.
|
TyeDye75
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-20-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Bush isn't fit to lick Carters boots |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:20 PM
Response to Original message |