A MUST-READ New Book: Webster Tarpley "9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA"

[spooked911]

http://www.waronfreedom.org/index.html#synth

This book probes and dissects the official 9/11 story and shows how it is complete hogwash.

Tarpley brings a historical perpective to the 9/11 attacks and shows how state-sponsored terrorism against the state is not new. Tarpley is an expert on the state-sponsored (synthetic) terror that went on in Germany and Italy during the 1970's and 1980's. Tarpley is also an expert on the Bush family, and is renowned for his unauthorized biography of George H. W. Bush.

The beginning is wonderful, as he completely eviscerates the 9/11 Independent Commission. This is just a small sample:
"For the Hamilton-Kean Commission is not a contribution to scholarly debate. It is just as much a part of the US government's assault on the world as an F-16 bombing Fallujah. For the Hamilton-Kean Commission is an act of ideological terrorism worthy of Senator Joe McCarthy."

For anyone interested in 9/11 truth, as I am, this book is the best yet.

[leesa]

1. Thanks for the tip. I have noticed that the RW propaganda machine

is putting out a little damage control concerning the 9-11 fabrications. Is it getting a bit warm?

[spooked911]

2. I hope so!

check out this rebuttal to an upcoming damage control 9/11 truth article in Popular Mechanics:
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/index.html

[SpiralHawk]

5. A snippet from the PM rebuttal

The article gives no hint of the put options on the targeted airlines, warnings received by government and corporate officials, complicit behavior by top officials, obstruction of justice by a much larger group, or obvious frauds in the official story.

Instead it attacks a mere 16 claims of its choosing, which it asserts are the "most prevalent" among "conspiracy theorists." The claims are grouped into topics which cover some of the subjects central to the analysis of 9-11 Research. However, for each topic, the article presents specious claims to divert the reader from understanding the issue.

[spooked911]

6. That's how they control 9/11 truth-- by finding the most outrageous claims

made by 9/11 activists, and then mocking them.

There a lot of real questions about 9/11 but the media won't touch it, and sadly neither will 99.9% of Democrats.

[spooked911]

3. Here's a major point Tarpley brings up-- the Dems got burned when they

believed the Bush admin on WMD in Iraq.

So why should the Dems believe Bush regarding 9/11?

Remember Blair's Iraq dossier-- how it was plagierized and full of distortions?

Remember how Blair also produced "proof" that bin Laden was connected to 9/11? Given what we know about Blair's Iraq presentation, isn't it likely that Blair's bin Laden proof is just another load of crap?

Another point is that Dems (such as Kerry) make a huge strategic mistake by always connecting bin laden to 9/11, because the proof of bin Laden's involvement in 9/11 is very weak.

The thing is that Bush has more flexibility because he doesn't focus on bin Laden. This is why he gets away with so much crap.

The answer to countering Bush is not to repeat his lies about bin laden and 9/11, but rather to expose the lies behind 9/11. THAT will bring down the Bush admin.

[spooked911]

4. You an view an excellent speech Tarpley gave here

http://911busters.com/