|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
mermaid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:38 PM Original message |
HOLY SMOKES!! Could There BE A THIRD BUSH TERM??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
andyhappy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
1. would that mean that Clinton could run again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. That would be funny! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. That could cause some strife in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosco T. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. It also means Clinton could come back.... n/m |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. Great...then we'll have Clinton back in no time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. Don't count on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jojo54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:46 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Let him try to run again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justinsb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. Problem is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yinkaafrica (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 05:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Bush would win. The system has been gamed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
6. Let 'em try. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
7. This has been tried on other occassions, an overwhelming majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
borg5575 (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 05:53 PM Response to Reply #7 |
29. Yes, in fact some Clinton supporters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
9. Why don't these freaks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
11. On another note... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kerrytravelers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
12. Everybody, sing with me now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
13. If it is like the original 22nd admendment it would only affect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Technowitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
15. In the aftermath of last November's electoral disaster... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
borg5575 (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 05:56 PM Response to Reply #15 |
30. No, I don't think they will suspend the election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beyurslf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
16. I would love to have Bill Clinton run against GW. Bring it on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bleacher Creature (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 05:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. I second that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTwentyoNine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
18. 2/3 vote,Not a chance of keeping this maniac in for four more years... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
judy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
19. I am afraid a lot of us here are still naive... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
20. Emperor-Chimp! That would complete the neo-conservative.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mermaid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 05:46 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Don't Worry, There IS An Amendment Filed To Repeal The 16th, Too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArtVandaley (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
21. I would actually support this amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mordarlar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 05:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. He was "destroyed" in 2004 Makes little differance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueInRed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
22. Yeah, I'd like to see Clinton vs little Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
23. Link failed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThorsHammer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
25. No......as others have said that would let (Bill) Clinton win instead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
28. takes 7/8 years to add or change an ammendment..not enough time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mermaid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 06:32 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. So What's To Stop The Fucker From Running In 2012?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 06:34 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. truth exposed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mermaid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 06:38 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Dreamer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-09-05 08:01 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. and i'm not the only one...... perhaps someday they will join us and...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 01:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC