Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Yorker article on Gannongate...going nowhere"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
snowbird42 Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:38 PM
Original message
New Yorker article on Gannongate...going nowhere"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. it's true, nothing will happen in Congress...
...question is whether additional facts can escape elsewhere, and reach critical mass outside the usual confines of control or power...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is why 2006 is so important.
"The non-Fox cable news outlets began to pick up on it last week; msnbc even assayed a special logo, “Gannongate.” A better name for it, though, would be “Nothinggate,” because nothing is what is likely to come of it. What all the memorable scandals of the past thirty years—real and fake alike, from Watergate to the Clinton impeachment—have had in common is that the opposition party controlled at least one house of Congress, which gave it the power to hold hearings and issue subpoenas. If Bush ends up having an easier time of it in his second term than any of his two-term predecessors since F.D.R., it won’t be because the scandals aren’t there. It’ll be because the tools to excavate them are under lock and key."

We need to control one of the Houses in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phaseolus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. this quote is on the mark
"If Bush ends up having an easier time of it in his second term than any of his two-term predecessors since F.D.R., it won’t be because the scandals aren’t there. It’ll be because the tools to excavate them are under lock and key."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. the tools to excavate the scandal are under lock and key ......
A better name for it, though, would be “Nothinggate,” because nothing is what is likely to come of it. What all the memorable scandals of the past thirty years—real and fake alike, from Watergate to the Clinton impeachment—have had in common is that the opposition party controlled at least one house of Congress, which gave it the power to hold hearings and issue subpoenas. If Bush ends up having an easier time of it in his second term than any of his two-term predecessors since F.D.R., it won’t be because the scandals aren’t there. It’ll be because the tools to excavate them are under lock and key.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good point. Its a gordian knot that we've got to find a way to cut.
Democrats have worked hard over the past four years and as "sorry everybody.com" shows, it wasn't enough.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. it's not mine, it's from the new yorker article in the OP.......
not trying to plagerize,
but then again i'm not a bald rentboy either...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Then we need to keep it "kicked" until Foreign Press investigates
"It's not over 'til it's over." All this nay-saying clearly has a motive at discouraging our fervor to get to the bottom of this.

And it is for that reason that we should NOT walk away from this. Not now. This story is on OUR turf.

NGU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Grab a shovel!! Lets keep digging! This will only become
"Nothinggate" if we allow it to become Nothinggate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. What we need is DUer "boots on the ground"...
IMHO of course.

Incredible amounts of information have been unearthed so far. There are still many questions as to who Gannon/Guckert actually is. In "real life" as opposed to online life, these questions would be delved into by sending an investigator to interview people who may have information. This would include neighbors, former and current (Delaware & DC; old city directories and white pages available at libraries) former coworkers (auto painting business) miltary contacts (FOIA?) associates and friends (fraternity, gay bars in DC and Delaware)

Plan of action:

Delaware and DC DUers could sign up to do "boots on the ground" research. Perhaps gay DUers could help to shake loose information in the gay community at bars and salons. A first place to start is the Wilmington Library to view the old phone books and city directories to find out his old address. Same oth DC, need to find out exactly where, Gannon is living, then steal his trash, stakeout his building, chat up his neighbors.

Lawyer DUers may be able to offer resources, especially lawyers who have done criminal representations. Ditto of prosecuters and former law enforcement who may be involved in private investigation.

There is no more Woodward and Bernstein, we must do it ourselves and right now we need confidential informants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrooklineT Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Isn't that the truth!!!!
I'm sure no one's surprised??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe certain members of Congress and the press won't investigate...
...this because they're afraid that their own names might be on Jimmy Jeff's Rolodex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbird42 Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. smoke screens
It seems to me that we have a smoke screen a day.
Yesterday the secret tapes
Today plot to assasinate Bush

No time for Gannongate.
I hope the digging continues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. theres a WORLD of "there" there
Edited on Tue Feb-22-05 10:48 PM by tinanator
I never expected such a rush of faux scandals trying to bury and distract. Its bigger than we could ever guess, no doubt about it. Keep on it, any one of us is better at digging than the fascist domestic press. Foreign and expatriated journalists are going to help, no doubt about it. Just get their work into the brains of the Bushbabies, and keep a light on the Franklin/Lawrence King/Omaha stuff
The hell with the crybabies, this is the big one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. well seriously, there are bigger reasons to impeach Bush than Gannongate
and it just ain't gonna happen until the Dems get congress back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinanator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. impeachment is a pipe dream
what you want is a total disenfranchisement and utter humiliation of the Bush dynasty. CRY HAVOC!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. The mole, the US media and a White House coup
The mole, the US media and a White House coup
The reporter who wasn't is part of a wider press scandal, writes Paul Harris in New York
Sunday February 20, 2005
The Observer

For two years Jeff Gannon cut an unobtrusive figure at White House press conferences. The shaven-headed, craggily handsome man worked for an obscure news agency called Talon News, known for its conservative sympathies. He was often the subject of jokes by colleagues on weightier news organisations.
No one is laughing now, because Gannon was far from being a harmless distraction. He was writing under a false name and working for a Republican front organisation. Suddenly, his 'softball' questions to White House officials looked less like eccentricities and more like plotting by an administration which has frequently displayed a dark mastery of the arts of press control.
When it emerged that Gannon was also linked to gay prostitution websites and might be a gay prostitute himself, the scandal as to how he was allowed daily access to the White House grew even murkier. The American media is now being forced to confront the possibility that Gannon, whose real name is James Guckert, was simply a Republican plant, used by officials, including President George W Bush, to ask easy questions in difficult press conferences. 'The idea of having a mole in the White House press corp is amazing, but that's what it looks like,' said Jack Lule, a journalism professor at Lehigh University.

Con't-
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/focus/story/0,6903,1418539,00.html


=====


I agree- Its on OUR turf!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I remember Jason Robards as Ben Bradlee talking to Redford and
Edited on Tue Feb-22-05 07:36 PM by demgrrrll
Hoffman in the film All the Presidents Men. He was yelling at them because none of the other major newspapers thought they had a story and he was worried about looking like a fool. Happens. Doesn't mean the New Yorker is right either. We need to continue to be persistent and relentless in our quest to make this story stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. If this thing has legs, it'll probably result in some low-level staffer
from the press room staff taking the fall for it. There never seems to be a shortage of drones to fall on their swords for this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marcologico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. Don't they wish.
Let's just say that Eustice Tilly is no Hunter Thompson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. Another *ism lie!!
He's a friggin hipocrite!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC