chelsea0011
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-01-05 09:49 AM
Original message |
Bush a stoner? I've been away. Did the media carry the Bush |
|
on a stone high groove story from the secret tapings. Or are they still talking about Clinton never inhaling?
|
DeaconBlues
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-01-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Mostly what was expressed was anger at that Wead character for being |
|
so disloyal as to record the private conversations of our great leader. Very little discussion of the fact that it finally comes out that Bush did drugs, except to mention the fact that he was politically savvy enough never to deny that he ever used drugs.
|
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-01-05 10:23 AM
Response to Original message |
2. My brother said he heard the tapes and he felt they didn't put |
|
Bush in a positive light. My brother reads mostly the Wall Street Journal and probably watches standard cable news networks. But he said he never heard of Sibel Edmonds when I dropped the name.
|
leesa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-01-05 10:26 AM
Response to Original message |
3. It was a distraction and contrived...it's good it didn't go anywhere |
|
The message was that Bush is honorable because he cares so much about the children and being a good leader. That was the BS contrived message. It was yet another WH planted story to control the message.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 06:37 AM
Response to Original message |