Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Watchdog group finds $12 billion of pork in defense legislation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 10:10 PM
Original message
Watchdog group finds $12 billion of pork in defense legislation
Watchdog group finds $12 billion of pork in defense legislation

By Peter Cohn, CongressDaily
From stainless steel bathrooms to high-intensity flashlights to parade field renovations, the $417.5 billion fiscal 2005 Defense appropriations bill ran the gamut with 2,671 earmarks totaling $12.2 billion, according to an exhaustive seven-month investigation by Taxpayers for Common Sense.

The budget watchdog group claims its report is the most comprehensive inspection ever of a Defense appropriations bill, identifying the home state or district that 86 percent of the well-hidden earmarks would benefit.

Naturally, the largest percentage of the spoils went to congressional leaders and members of the House and Senate Appropriations committees, the group found. House leaders, for their part, averaged $416 million in earmarks for their constituents while House Appropriations Chairman Jerry Lewis -- the former Defense Appropriations Subcommittee chairman -- helped to bring home almost $1 billion in fiscal 2005 to California, the report found, although only about $28 a head in his densely populated state.

In the House, Washington state received the most per person in defense funds at $57.91 a head, thanks to the presence of former Rep. George Nethercutt, a Republican, and Democratic Rep. Norm Dicks on the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee.

http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0305/031105cdpm1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Regarding Washington State's share,
the spirit of Scoop Jackson is still alive. (Dem father of the PNACers)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. why did they do house members by state, not district?
why did they point out that lewis's pork was only $28/head when you divide his pork by the entire state of california?

ok, i'm sure it's hard enough allocating the pork to the state level, nevermind trying to figure out how it's allocated at the district level. but i think it's safe to assume that the politicians are sure to help their own district much more than the rest of the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC