Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Great points made by Dem Senate Campaign on the Bush mandate!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 05:35 AM
Original message
Great points made by Dem Senate Campaign on the Bush mandate!
How's that whole mandate business working out for you, Mr. President?


Remember a month ago when George Bush was trying to convince us he has some mythical "mandate" to dismantle Social Security? Turns out that even some members of his own party didn't really believe it.


Republican Senators Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, both from Maine, have refused to endorse Bush's privatization scheme. Even one of Bush's top White House advisors was quoted anonymously today as concerned that losing on Social Security now will cause Republicans to lose Senate races next year.

My question is where's the vaunted Republican party discipline when they really need it?


Rick Santorum, Man of the People?


A new and improved Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) was in the news this week offering a proposal to raise the minimum wage. Well...sort of.


Actually, Slick Rick's proposal would have made it harder to collect overtime pay by abolishing the 40-hour work week and replacing it with an 80-hour two-week accounting period. It would have forced waiters and other tipped employees to work for tips only by allowing employers to pay those employees zero actual salary.


Despite all that, we just might go along with Santorum's new-found "compassionate conservatism." Except that his minimum wage proposal was so stingy that even Sen. Arlen Specter, another Republican from Pennsylvania, rejected it in favor of Sen. Ted Kennedy's much larger proposed increase. That's right. Santorum's proposal is so bad that some Republicans are supporting Ted Kennedy instead.


The truth is that Rick Santorum is no friend of working families. He's voted against increasing the minimum wage at least half a dozen times. Now that his 2006 reelection bid is shaping up to be the fight of his political life - Presto! - he is trying to recast himself as a dedicated man of the people. We're not going to buy it. Of course, with the minimum wage so low, I'm not sure we can afford it.


Pennsylvania Polling


More good news from the Keystone State just today. SurveyUSA has Santorum losing 49-42 to leading Democratic candidate and current state Treasurer Bob Casey, Jr. It's a good thing Sen. Kennedy is trying to enact a real minimum wage increase. A two-term senator with numbers this low this early is likely to be looking for a new line of work real soon.


Senate Republicans Oppose Everything


Senate Budget Committee Democrats are doing their best to make the Bush budget into something tolerable. It's not working.


Yesterday, Budget Committee Republicans voted against Democratic efforts to do the following: save Social Security first, restore fiscal responsibility, put more cops on the streets, equip and train first responders, revitalize communities, provide full funding for veteran's health care, and let Medicare negotiate better prescription drug prices for seniors.


There's still one more vote left on preventing the kicking of puppies. We'll see where the Republicans come down on that one.


Quote of the Day


"We don't do Lincoln Day dinners in South Carolina. It's nothing personal, but it takes awhile to get over things." -- Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-SC), speaking to the annual Knox County Lincoln Day dinner

Well, at least it's nothing personal.


Sincerely,

Anne H. Lewis


Want to help us beat Rick Santorum and elect more Democrats to the Senate in 2006? Make a contribution to the DSCC today!


http://www.dscc.org/contribute

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah. But this DSCC story was a little rough.
Abortion Advocates Still Upset by Pro-Life Democrat Senate Candidates

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
March 11, 2005

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Abortion advocates are still upset with Democrat leaders who have coalesced behind two candidates for the U.S. Senate who oppose abortion. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has recruited Pennsylvania state Treasurer Bob Casey and Rhode Island Rep. Jim Langevin to run in Senate races in those states.

Not only have top Democrats recruited candidates who oppose abortion, they've attempted to clear the field and persuade other Democrats from declaring their candidacies.

-snip-

In Rhode Island, Democratic officials have unsuccessfully tried to persuade pro-abortion Secretary of State Matt Brown to exit the race.

-snip-

In Langevin and Casey are elected, they would join a small list of pro-life Democrats in the Senate. Only Nebraska Senator Ben Nelson has a consistent pro-life voting record.

http://www.lifenews.com/nat1226.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff in Cincinnati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-05 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The traditional problem with being a "Big Tent" party
We have a lot of issues and not all of them coalesce nicely. I have friends who are rabidly pro-union. They support a living wage, universal healthcare, and making NAFTA either fair to everybody or trashing it and starting all over again.

Turns out they're just not that big on gun control or protecting the environment.

So what are you supposed to do? Vote for the other guy with whom you disagree on every subject, wait around for that "perfect" candidate to come along -- who might not ever come along or might be totally unelectable for other reasons?

Unless there a viable alternative (and in the case of Bob Casey, I'd say he's definitely the strongest candidate), you grit you teeth and get at least two-thirds of your agenda adopted. Beats nothing at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC