|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
trumad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:40 PM Original message |
Peter Jennings did the Dems a huge favor with the "Deserter" question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MIMStigator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. and don't you owe someone a thank you for that Mr. Trumad? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. I'm a Clark guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MIMStigator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. you're right I give him an 8.5 out of 10 for his answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LTR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. The seed has been planted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiCoup2K4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Overloading them (i.e.911) is what made them Bush's sheep to begin with... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kstewart33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
3. Clark did a great job with that question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
digno dave (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. Jenning sleight of hand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. Kudos to the Scriptwriter for Peter Jennigs! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frank frankly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
6. yep, the whores were on full display |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
7. Absolutely. It was fantastic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
10. i agree! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KFC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
11. Agreed - Clark showed a lot of political savvy with his response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. There have been a lot of those lately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HFishbine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
13. Moore's Great! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
14. I think you might be right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MIMStigator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
15. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
16. And Clark answered by saying nothing untrue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annagull (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
17. Yep, AWOL is officially a ball in play now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Valjean (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
18. INADVERTENTLY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dumpster_baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
19. I really doubt Bush was AWOL or Deserter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Oh...So you can enlist, take hundreds of thousands of tax payer dollars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trumad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:57 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Here ya go dumpster baby... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 11:00 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. If the UCMJ doesn't apply to the National Guard, then what rules do.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 11:20 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. Actually, I believe if you are absent without authorization for 30 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zech Marquis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
21. very surprised that Jennings brought it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 11:09 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Its been bubbling for a few days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
25. Anyone else think Jennings was on our side on that one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWebHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
27. so who in the WH press core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
28. Trumad, You Just May Be On to Something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
29. Clark took a big risk for us too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 11:23 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I think you just said a mouthful n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-22-04 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
31. I don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC