Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was there a hit out on Clark tonight?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 10:55 PM
Original message
Was there a hit out on Clark tonight?
I don't think so. All the candidates had their share of oddball, confrontational and loaded questions. Clark's inexperience as a campaigner is what made it seem as if things were tougher for him.

I've been saying for months that Clark needed to respond to the conflict between his lobbying for Acxiom and his stated positions on civil liberties. The heat of a debate is not where you want to answer this kind of question the first time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. If you "don't think so", then you phrased your question wrong, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Suggestion?
How would you have asked it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. "Much Ado about Nothing. Clark Ruled."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Well now
That's not a question, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. I DID get the gist of what he was saying about Acxiom, but he could
have made it clearer. Something that clearly stated that he was involved with the company because he was interested in improving national safety, but that he had NO input into the filal product (because he was no longer involved with them by then) and if he HAD had input into the final product, he would have insisted on the system respecting personal privacy.

This is one of those issues that I agree with him on...I just don't think he always frames his answers well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Interesting
As someone who disagrees with him on the issue, I do have to say that I think he made the case you articulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I'm not surprised
Its what I've been saying for over a month, and I agree with his position.

cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, the whores want Kerry, they know he'll be easier to gun down in theGE
They should be ashamed of themselves. Even Kerry's lighting was different that the other candidates. He was lite more from above it was weird. I wish I was stupid enough to fall for this shit, I would be a lot happier.

BTW The fact that they so strongly attacked clark tonight, it restored all my faith in the man. He is no repub! Thank goodness, it was hard not trusting him.

They fear Dean and Clark, they should team up and kick um where it hurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Thank you, Melodybe
Kind words. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misterphelps Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Post game was a hatchet job
The 7 person debate is not Clark's best forum. That said, I thought he did an excellent job answering the questions, including Acxiom. The post debate commentary was a definite hit. They loved Lieberman and Kerry for crying out loud!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think most of the candidates got tough questions tonight
It might hurt a little more for Clark supporters though because he hasn't participated in the last several debates. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgpenn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. You have been saying for months everything positive about Dean
And look where your advice has gotten you! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I'm sorry...
who are you for again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. No, it's just that when you skip debates the backorder piles up.
They had to do some venting, bout time I say. This was the first debate that wasn't a flame Dean fest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hope everyone knows Jennings & Hume
are close friends.

Brit Hume was a reporter for ABC for years, while Jennings was anchor.

I've heard both of them talk about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-22-04 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. so? all the media whores know each other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC