Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

10,340 people arrested in just 6 days - WTF?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:00 PM
Original message
10,340 people arrested in just 6 days - WTF?
I xml BBC and this story flashed across the ticker. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4446837.stm

US Police catch 10,000 fugitives"

Snip-

"US police arrest more than 10,000 fugitives in just six days, in what they say is the largest operation of its kind in US history. More than 3,000 federal and local officers arrested 10,340 people during Operation Falcon, from 4-10 April.

Attorney-General Alberto Gonzales said law enforcement officers primarily targeted violent offenders. The number is about 10 times as many fugitives as were arrested in the same period last year.


Now normally, I would say this is a good thing but this seems like an awefully large number of people to be caught up in the police nets.

They list a total of 1,575 people arrested. And this is thier crimes. "A total of 162 murder suspects, 553 rape or sexual assault suspects and 154 gang members were arrested, US Marshals said. In addition, 638 armed robbery suspects and 68 kidnapping suspects were held."

So what were all of the other 8,765 people arrested for in Operation Falcon? Is there any relation to any political agenda that may coincide with this crack-down? This is an extremely large amount of people to get nabbed in this drag net. If these people were fugitives, how did they track them down so easily? If they were this easy to catch, why weren't they caught earlier? What is going to be the impact on our court system? Is there any relation to the recent hearings on the Patriot Act? Something smells fishy about this, it may just be my overactive imagination but can you blame me?

Here's a link to the U.S. Marshalls website, http://www.usdoj.gov/marshals/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder what the "cost to taxpayers" was?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. I wonder how many Patriot Act sponsored sneak and peaks they performed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
39. The Cost....
If they all get convicted, (most likely), the cost of incarceration will be approx. $23,000-$50,000 per inmate, per year, of our tax-dollars, (depending upon which State they are convicted in). That does not include the costs of the investigations, the arrests, the pre-trial incarceration, court costs, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. This was the lead story on ABC tonight.
That's a lot of people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. How many of these...
Will simply gum up the courts and be thrown out because they are simply bad arrests and cases?

You are correct: what is not being revealed is far more telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. big story on CBS also--Gonzalos giving a news conference about it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. What is he saying?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I hope all of them are actually guilty of something illegal
and not "patriot act" minutea. I had seen the story elsewhere but seeing it here kicked in the sceptic alert (and a momentary chill).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Whoa! I'm glad we have this transparent democracy...
Holy crap! Gonzales goin' Gestapo on our asses.

Remember when that incompetant boob John Ashcroft was around? Am I starting to miss him? OH GOD!! Get it off, get it off...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. "Goin' Gestapo" - good phrase.
Consider this a dry run for the main event, coming soon at a hometown near you.



RTP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. According to Countdown, it was an idea dreamed up by the
US Marshal Service to prove to Congress it could do this sort of work - an idea to get more money.
I forget how much they said it cost, but the vast majority of the arrests were drug-related.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. If the majority of them are drug related; I'm left to wonder...
How many of them were busted for Pot charges of some sort and how many of them were the real dangerous drugs like Meth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Wait a second, they're not sending Tommy Chong back are they?
The meth guys run too fast, the PCP guys fight back, and the crack guys stink up the back seat, so they HAVE to go for pot heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
38. "Marshall Service" OR "Homeland Security?"
Has anyone else recently received an email recruiting for Homeland Security positions? I receive two or three of them (about a month ago now)...on my MSN Hotmail email address ONLY. It was a full-color ad, with pictures of official-looking uniformed law-enforcement officers (male and female).

Needless to say, I quickly marked it as "spam," and blocked future receipt of that ad after the second time I received it.

Did anyone else get a similar email? Downright scarey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. What bullshit,most likely a load of unpaid speeding tickets.....
brought the Feds to your door. Or maybe some are deadbeat dads etc...There aren't 10,000 violent fugitives running around the US.

What a joke....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Actually, the scary thing is there may be and they just didn't want to...
catch them. Obviously, they can. If they can be so successful in 6 days, why haven't they been this successful in the past? If they can find over 10,000 in 6 days, how many could they find in 60 or 360?

A fugitive, by definition, is in hiding and probably difficult to find. What tools did they employ to find these hidden criminals? Sounds a bit too much like a police state for my liking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTwentyoNine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. True,but my point is it can be for any Mickey Mouse offense....
Its obvious how they'll spin this nonsense---they'll play up all these arrests as the most evil,vicious murderers/killers/rapists in the US.

In reality it could be a fugitive who's running from not paying child support,loads of traffic tickets etc....

I'll love to see how many were really violent offenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. In my opinion, a deadbeat dad IS a violent fugitive - more for
what he breeds (poverty upon his children) than for anything he's physically doing that might or might not be violent. Poverty is the root cause for a lot of blue-collar crime.

However, most of these arrests were drug-related.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. More Felon purges for the next election!!!!!
10,000 less Democrats!! Don't you guys get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. No shit... good point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. Operation Fall-on, is just another way to blur the lines, how many corp..
Criminals, has this idiot prosecuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
37. Yes, but remember...they DO have Martha Stewart "ankled."
No we're all safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. Maybe these guys could catch Bin Laden.
Bush sure can't. Does he even remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Who? Oh.... No, we're not really that concerned about him especially...
since if we caught him, people might not support everlasting war. Besides, then they may have to prove he did it and well... that may be a bit difficult since it seems highly unlikely he could have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. 10,000 aressts need due process and it will have judges working HARD .....
was wondering if this wasn't a payback to judges for the Schiavo thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I doubt that but it would certain muddle things up a but for the courts.
No, this is about showing the success of the Patriot Act. Any court room violence would be a bonus for Delay and the gang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
36. What makes you think these people will get "due process?"
We're talking Gonzales, Negroponte, DeLay, Shrub, Cheney.

Whether indeed this many people were arrested, the point IS it was meant to frighten all us "sheeple."

Scarey, scarey stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conservdem Donating Member (880 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. I too would like to the answer to your question about:
Edited on Thu Apr-14-05 07:33 PM by conservdem
"If they were this easy to catch, why weren't they caught earlier?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
24. April 5, 2005 - Attorney general defends Patriot Act
Gonzales tells Senate panel he is 'open to suggestions'
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/04/05/patriot.act/

Gee - no connection here folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Dem's biggest wound, in battle to be Progressive, no need to sing, no choir
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
25. Anyone know what the current number of arrests are in America?
What impact would 10,000 more have on this percentage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. practice run for the real thing
So they are training teams to conduct nationwide mass arrests, making sure they have the logistics all set.

Gee I wonder why they would be doing that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. bet you're right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. 40,000 people are arested a day in the U.S. 10,000 a week isn't a lot.
Edited on Thu Apr-14-05 08:17 PM by Massacure
I bet ya ten brownie points Gonzalez is an attention whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Right but these people are described as fugitives
These are people who have been convicted but haven't served thier sentence. Bail Jumpers, escapees, no shows for court dates etc. The rate of capture for these people is much lower. Attention whore or not, this is a very large number of people to capture in this demographic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #28
45. these were Federal arrests...not state or county biddness.these will swamp
fed judges courts...payback for Scvhiavo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. Lots of parole violations, bail jumpers, etc., too.
Not all 10K were arrested on new charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
31. Any of them have the surname Bin Laden?
Then I fail to understand why I should be impressed. And your point about the unidentified charges against the other 8,765 citizens is *very* well-taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
34. My thoughts exactly! Thanks for starting a thread on it.
I heard it on AAR news, and I was appalled by what I thought was a "1,000" number in less than a week. Then I heard it repeated as "10,000"...in the same sentence as "Gonzalez," and I thougt OMG!!

If they're rounding people up that quick (an average of 200 per state)...they are NOT giving "due process," they're literally lynching people. I don't believe for a second that there were that many serious criminals un-arrested. And how could they possibly have tracked down and booked them all so quickly...with such vast vudget cuts? The article says they were arrested by "Sheriffs?" Or "Homeland Security" personnel. My guess is most of these essentially minority, powerless people will not even get the benefit of a Public Defender. I also started wondering where they'd "house" all these 10,000 prisoners. Certainly NOT at local jails (not enough room or local funding). Do they plan to ship them overseas for incarceration in Cuba or wherever? Or will they put them in all those Detention Camps we've discussed which have been built all over the country? And once they're "captured" and wrongly accused, they'll be "free labor" or perhaps they plan to work toward "clearing their record" by enlisting in the Military? That would help out the recent shortage in Enlistees.

This sounds so predatorial. And so quick.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
35. practice for the big liberal, er, "terra-ist"
roundup

next phase of the coup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
40. Funny how there were tens of thousands in a protest last week
and this is how the US responds. I can't believe there's no connection there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-15-05 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. A grand show to point out that the police
can get the job done when the actually want to do so. A practice run for when Martial Law is announced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhite5 Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. What makes you think Martial Law will be announced in advance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
42. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-16-05 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
44. It was a practice run for future mass arrests of political dissidents...
Stormtrooper Training 101.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC