Bleacher Creature
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 09:13 AM
Original message |
Man Coulter on the Cover of Time? |
|
Edited on Sun Apr-17-05 09:38 AM by abernste
I know that we shouldn't be giving Sludge too many hits by linking to him, but this is too much. Liberal media my ass. http://www.drudgereport.com/flash1.htmWarning: Vile Images Attached.
|
Clark2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 09:17 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Oh Goody! I can fumigate my house now and, when that's done, |
|
I can stick this issue out in the garden to scare off the birds!
:puke:
|
brucefan
(421 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 09:17 AM
Response to Original message |
|
please post a graphic warning.I just finished breakfast.
|
Bleacher Creature
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. You're right -- my sincerest apologies. eom |
pretzel4gore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 09:18 AM
Response to Original message |
3. maybe they'll darken her eyes... |
|
like they got caught doing to an oj simpson pic a decade ago ...otoh 'time' mag loves 'Anus' coulter, her crap and everything bushevik!
|
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message |
5. F*CK! This is INSANE! Giving this much exposure to a F*CKING NAZI? |
|
Edited on Sun Apr-17-05 09:29 AM by onehandle
We have to complain about this.
Loud!!!!
Contact Time Magazine:
Time Inc. 1271 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 (phone: 212-397-4622)
letters@time.com
|
Feathered Fish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
She's completely insane, why in the hell would they put her on the cover? I mean it would be stupid to write a two paragraph blurb on her, let alone a cover story. Hopefully (but I doubt they will) they will write something that is scathing. She has made a more complete ass of herself in recent months - so criticism is in order. But it is Time mag, so whatever. I'll write my letter, but I doubt, if this is true, it will have any impact. Freakin' weirdos.
|
Vickers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |
6. It's wild, freepers think she's sexy, but it's like Barney Fife with a wig |
|
*shudder*
But then again, they think George is "brave," Rush is "smart," and Fox News is "fair and balanced." :eyes:
|
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Madness, sheer madness. Its all gone bad....delusional thinking gone wild |
gmoney
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I almost cancelled after the Man of the Year insult, and the 100 most influential evangelicals, but pimping Man Coulter is the last straw. I put in my cancellation request today. I had over two years left on my subcription, so those asshats better give me a nice refund so I can renew my sub to Mother Jones and The Nation.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. I do not think it is flattering pose at all!! --puny body sitting in a big |
|
--and those pointed shoes!!--te he
|
Crunchy Frog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Those feet are so HUGE. |
|
I wonder if it means s/he has a REALLY big schlong.
|
gmoney
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. yeah, the skirt's so short you can almost see her... |
|
yeah, the skirt's so short you can almost see her...(choose one) a) brains b) balls c) resume d) red states
|
AntiCoup2K4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
OneTwentyoNine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. That was my first thought,she APPROVED that photo?? |
|
Whew...real flattering Ann.
|
Clark2008
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
19. The pointy shows... heehee |
|
Maybe Coulter's the Wicked Witch of Skinny White Bitches with Self-Destructing Attitudes.
(No offense to any real witches out there. I was referring to the classic, media portrayal).
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Kool McKool
(9 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message |
15. The Time article is a major puff-piece ... |
|
... and starts out with the author sharing a bottle of wine and some laughs with Coulter. There must have been some serious under-the-table dinky-stroking going on at that meal!
|
Bleacher Creature
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message |
17. What pisses me off most. |
|
Now that I've had time to cool down after my initial post, what bothers me the most is that this so-called "respected" publication is giving this "woman" some credibility.
Look, I have no problem with them featuring prominent Conservatives, but she's a joke. The message coming across from Time is this: "The more outlandish and irresponsible you are, the more press you get." Seriously, why not just make David Duke or Matthew Hale your cover person and get it over with!
|
mainer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Wasn't Hitler on the cover once? |
|
It's not necessarily a good thing for her.
|
CurtEastPoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-17-05 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
20. LOL! I just emailed Time and their email inbox is FULL! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:24 AM
Response to Original message |