Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question: Couldn't the Dems SUE the GOP if they go nuclear?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
johnnyrocket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 03:29 PM
Original message
Question: Couldn't the Dems SUE the GOP if they go nuclear?
Because by all accounts, it's ILLEGAL to change the Senate rules without a 2/3 vote. They could take the 'rule' change the GOP pushes through, and go straight to the Supreme Court and argue the rule change in wholly unconstitutional! The Supremes could overrule the change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because of separation of powers, the SC could not interfere.
Unless it specifically says in the Constitution that 2/3 vote or 60% or whatever, is required to change how the Senate does things, the Court cannot intervene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't forget this is the same 4 black robes that gave us george 2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. The courts rarely get involved with rules of each congressional chamber
Edited on Sun Apr-17-05 03:42 PM by tritsofme
Because Article I Section 5 states:

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't agree
that by all accounts you need 2/3rds to change the senate rules.

By precedent perhaps, but the Constitution is pretty clear about listing places where a super-majority is needed.

For instance to pass a Constitutional amendment you need 2/3rds of each house and 3/4 of the state legislatures.

On rules, all the Constitution says is each house can make its own rules. If the Constitution meant by a 2/3rds vote, it would have said so.

The damage here needs to be political, not legal. It needs to hurt them vote-wise if they force through the change. It needs to cost them votes for over-reaching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. forget the dems - could a citizen file a suit?
I mean these people are given power by us, really, if you think about it. They serve the people and the people maybe think this is illegal...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. On what basis or grounds?
Would you file a suit?

They're not breaking any laws per se, just breaking with tradition and stretching rules to their maximum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. We could say that someone, somewhere got a blow job.
We all know that this is the basis of all evil, and the nation and lawmakers will rally around us to root out said evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Courts are NOT going to get into Senate rules!
there's a strong separation of powers tradition and something like this they would not touch with a ten foot pole. The senate rules are not listed in the constitution so the courts will defer to the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Charon Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Sue the GOP
Don't think so. The Constitution states the House and Senate are free to make their own rules for managing business. The "Nuclear Option is in fact a rule change which by current Senate rules only requires 51%. There appears to be no legal basis to sue on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. No
The Senate is free to make its own rules. There is no way the courts would get involved in this. It's a Separation of Powers issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC