Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2008 Convention

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 06:31 PM
Original message
2008 Convention
I'm curious.. :think: Does anyone know how the selection process works as far as securing dates for the Democratic and Republican National Conventions?

I know that as far as choosing a location, each party reviews bids by various cities and eventually makes a selection.

But how are the actual =DATES= chosen? :shrug:

While some people may feel that the national conventions aren't that big a deal.. I still think it sucked royally that ours was FIVE WEEKS after the R-convention.

If we opted to have ours say.. 3 or 4 weeks AFTER theirs in '08, will that be an option?

Anyone know how securing the dates works? ~~Thanks! :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, what a great question!
Wish I had a clue.

I'll be sure to stick to this thread and leech info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks Doc....
I've Googled myself crazy :silly: but I can't find any info on how the date selection process works..

Maybe I'll zap Howard Dean a message and ask him.. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. it was
5 weeks before. The incumbent party always goes last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks Dave..
I meant "before"... typo. :dunce:

Sooo.. are you saying the Republicans will have theirs after us again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes, that's unfortunately the way it works
The incumbent party always goes second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. yes
our's will likely be 3-4 weeks before their's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Knowing Dean, he'll probably want it in ....
Dallas, Houston or who knows maybe Selma, AL. :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. My problem with that idea is... look at what happened to the GOP in NY
The only place that they could've had it that would've attracted a bigger protest crowd is Washington DC and nobody has their convention in DC.

I think the best way to go is a liberal city in a red state. Denver, Atlanta, New Orleans, and even Austin TX would all be good locations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well there will be some RW protesters .......
but nothing like what they did in N.Y. My point being is Dean would probably have it in a Red State just to piss off the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RPM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Come to Pittsburgh
Please - we need the money! And we are a good blue state city!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. After the 88 convention
There's no way they'll do Atlanta. But I agree with the Liberal City in a Red State idea. Other choices following this criteria would include St. Louis, Cleveland, Miami, Vegas, and Phoenix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Vegas = bad idea
It will give them another lame excuse to call us anti family values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Very true
I was just naming off Blue cities in swing states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC