Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fire Bombs in Iraq: Napalm By Any Other Name

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 06:17 PM
Original message
Fire Bombs in Iraq: Napalm By Any Other Name



Fire Bombs in Iraq: Napalm By Any Other Name (Apr 2005)

An updated version of this briefing was posted on 17 April 2005.
http://www.iraqanalysis.org/briefings/232

> 4-18-05, 9:03 am
>
> From Iraq Analysis Group
>
> Summary
>
> This briefing examines the continuing use of incendiary weapons by the US military in Iraq. US officials have been forced to admit using the MK-77 incendiary, a modern form of napalm, at least during the initial fighting stage of the war. In direct contradiction, the UK government continues to deny that such weapons have been used in Iraq at any time. The UK is party to an international convention banning incendiaries where they may cause harm to civilians. In Iraq, UK forces are part of a coalition which does not adhere to internationally agreed standards of warfare.
>
> 1. Napalm past
>
> A fire bomb is a thin-skinned container of fuel gel. It ignites on impact, spreading the burning gel over a wide area. The composition of the fuel gel has evolved over the years:
> * World War II: gasoline plus naphthenic and palmitic acids
> * Vietnam & Korea: gasoline, benzene and polystyrene
> * Iraq (MK-77 Mod 5): kerosene-based jet fuel and polystyrene

....Napalm has also been used in Iraq in the past. The Ba’ath regime of Saddam Hussein used it during the 1991 uprising. In 1992 Human Rights Watch reported:
>
> Refugees alleged that Iraqi helicopters dropped a variety of ordnance on civilians, including napalm and phosphorus bombs, chemical agents and sulfuric acid. Representatives of human rights and humanitarian organizations who saw refugees with burn injuries or photographs of such injuries were unable to confirm the source of the burns, although doctors who examined injured Iraqis said that some of the wounds were consistent with the use of napalm.<1>
>
>
> 2. Napalm present
>
> The US military has in its current arsenal a modern form of napalm. Known as the MK-77 Mod 5, the bombs are dropped from aircraft and ignite on impact. They contain a lethal mixture of aircraft fuel and polystyrene, which forms a sticky, flammable gel. As it burns, the gel sticks to structures and to the bodies of its victims. The light aluminium containers lack stabilising fins, making them far from precision weapons........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is obscene. Napalm by any name or definition (of which this shit
fits)is an cruel, horrendous, evil, inhumane weapon. I am so ashamed and sick that the military in this country would, and is, using it on the Iraqis. This can't be justified, not even by a sick, dark, twisted mind like Rumsfeld's. Or Franks, or Sanchez, or any of those sick bastards that have found it's 'fun to kill some people'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FtWayneBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I totally agree - those using it should be
up on war crimes charges in International court.

(whether they happen to belong to it or not)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC