The Witch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-25-05 06:17 AM
Original message |
Urgent, help 1-sentence on why we oppose each of the 10 judicial nominees |
|
Trying to get through to C-SPAN this morning, can someone fill me in?
|
BlueEyedSon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-25-05 06:26 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Because Bush only appoints right-wing religious ideologues.... |
ClintonTyree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-25-05 06:30 AM
Response to Original message |
|
have demonstrated time and again that they will push their morality from the bench. They're not interested in the law, they're interested in their version of morality. Hope that helps.
|
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-25-05 06:33 AM
Response to Original message |
3. It is the Senate constitutional role to advise and consent and to |
|
sometimes advise not to accept judges who have a history of letting their personable beliefs and, not the law, guide their decisions.
|
sendero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-25-05 06:51 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Of any administration's appointments.. |
|
.... 5% are going to be unsuitable for the job, and that is why we have the advice and consent of the senate.
|
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-25-05 07:14 AM
Response to Original message |
|
be sure to point out that 205 have made it thru. only hold up on ten. that is only 4-5% of choices not allowed thru. the repugs denied over 46 of clintons
|
The Witch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-26-05 07:26 AM
Response to Original message |
6. I'd like to know personally about these people |
|
Why are THEY objectionable?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message |