Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, would Bush have invaded the Soviet Union in 1945?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 11:30 PM
Original message
So, would Bush have invaded the Soviet Union in 1945?
Bush says Yalta was a big sell-out. So what would have been his brilliant fucking idea to prevent Soviet domination of Eastern Europe?

What would he have done, send the American army to Moscow?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fone Book Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's my history teacher's take-
"The decisions of 60-year-olds at home are made up by the actions of 16-year-olds on the battlefield." (paraphrase) --Joe Colistra, teacher of sophomore A.P. Modern European History

Stalin was able to declare Eastern Europe as his sphere of influence because the Red Army occupied Eastern Europe. Bush is a fucking jackass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocottelle Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bush?
An idea? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Probably would have saved
one of the two a-bombs for Moskow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minnesotaDFLer Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. or just made a new one
what a maniac
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. FDR *was* snookered. The USSR was very weakened at the end of WWII.
Edited on Sat May-07-05 11:53 PM by Psephos
But FDR was also very weakened at the end of WWII. Read one of the good biographies, and you'll understand that in those final months, he was fading fast, physically as well as mentally.

With benefit of hindsight, it's hard to see how anyone could agree to a partitioning scheme that practically guaranteed a geopolitical standoff between Eastern communists and Western capitalists. Yet, if not for FDR, there would have been no Yalta in the first place. The Yalta critics usually omit that.

Compounding the problem, Truman was later led to believe that the USSR was *way* behind the US in atomic weapons technology, and that the US monopoly would continue indefinitely, given that the Germans were out of the picture. A profound shock reverberated through Washington when the Soviets detonated their first bomb in 1949. In moments, the Cold War that had been laid in place by the partitioning of Europe crystallized into reality.

How shocking was the USSR's acquisition of atomic weapons? Enough that Bertrand Russell called for Truman to threaten the USSR with annihilation unless they dismantled their program. Russell, the ultimate peacenik, calling for a showdown over nuclear arms because the alternative - a Cold War ending with a nuclear hot war in the future - seemed inevitable. Wow.

As for Bush, all I can say is "phhhmpf." Whatever he knows about Yalta was printed on his breakfast tray placemat this morning.

Peace.

EDIT: inserted missing word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. FDR was fading? I could be wrong, but I thought his stroke was a huge
surprise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Only to the public
Those close to Roosevelt knew his health was failing. FDR himself did not really want the 4th term, but didn't see anyway he could not run. Look at the pictures of him from the last year of his life and it's obvious he was not well.

Supposedly, one of the reason he picked Truman for VP was that he did not think he'd live out his term and he felt Truman would know how to be tough with Stalin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 12:03 AM
Original message
But wasn't he incredibly active laying down the foundation for the UN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. The framework for the UN was agreed upon at Yalta
But despite his fervent belief in its necessity, FDR was not its actual architect.

Some say FDR wanted the UN badly enough that he made himself believe Stalin would keep his promise to hold free elections in Eastern Europe soon after the end of the war.

If you're interested in an excellent, concise account of FDR's final year, check out Robert H. Ferrel's The Dying President: Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1944-1945.

For the larger picture, try Conrad Black's Franklin Delano Roosevelt: Champion of Freedom.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. But wasn't he incredibly active laying down the foundation for the UN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. But wasn't he incredibly active laying down the foundation for the UN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merbex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. His daughter knew how ill her father was;
a few surrounding FDR knew it was more than likely,MOST likely, he would not live to fulfill his fourth term
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. FDR was fading? I could be wrong, but I thought his stroke was a huge
surprise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. But there was still the War in the Pacific
FDR couldn't tell Stalin to f*ck himself, because we still had to finish against the Japanese. Stalin played coy, literally, until the last few weeks of the war against Japan, only declaring war against them (if he ever did . . . I'm not entirely sure) right at the end. His intention in August 1945 was completely cynical -- to get his hands on those islands between Sakhalin Island (part of USSR) and the northernmost Japanese home islands.

FDR was also dying. Read David Brinkley's book, "Washington Goes to War." The dirty little secret of the 1944 election was that FDR went through that campaign "grey." He was dying. Nobody said anything about it because they were hoping he'd live to see the end of the war.

Thus, Bush's shot today was about as cheap as they get. What a PRICK! And he dishonors his own father's heroic service in the Pacific air war!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The agreement Stalin didn't keep...
...was the one to hold free elections in Eastern Europe after the cessation of hostilities.

The agreement to declare war on Japan was pure opportunism. Japan had nothing left to fight with.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. Bush's first answer to everything is war.
This is further proof. He doesn't believe in negotiations or peace. He is a homicidal war monger. Weren't the millions who died in WW2 enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merbex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Instead of realizing that the 2 Super powers managed to avert
a huge conflagation AGAIN, on the European continent- this time with nuclear weapons - and that containment works (thank you George Kennon) even though it took 50 years- this chickenhawk wants us to think he could have done it better?

I truly can't believe how often this guy manages, once again,to make me sick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, and EVEN Nixon were really great...
When you think about the fact that they managed to keep us from going to war with the USSR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Bush would have invaded Britain.
And blamed Pearl Harbor on the Chinese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. Only if they had oil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. well your answer to that is north korea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC