CNN Poll: "legitimate targets for U.S. military strikes outside war zones"

[Bush_Eats_Beef]

In other words, can we just start dropping bunker bombs if we think there might be some terra there...you know, smoke 'em out of their caves and such.

:scared:

http://www.cnn.com/

Are suspected al Qaeda members outside war zones legitimate targets for U.S. military strikes?

Yes 87%

15283 votes

No 13%

2364 votes

[Vincardog]

1. What if the were in your basement? WTF is wrong with these people?

Are suspected al Qaeda members outside war zones legitimate targets for U.S. military strikes?

Yes 87% 16622 votes

No 13% 2578 votes
Total: 19200 votes

[whistle]

2. Low yield nuclear bunker buster bombs to be exact

[Skink]

3. Well Iran's close by anyway...

We just sent over an extra 80 billion. What are we waiting for?

[damntexdem]

4. Hell, the U.S. military can't manage to hit the right targets ...

even INSIDE war zones.

[Clark2008]

5. So, why didn't we bomb New York and Florida after OK City?

I mean, Timothy McVeigh was from New York and lived in Florida.

:eyes:

[damntexdem]

6. But was based in Kansas.

Don't forget to bomb there.

[Mika]

9. They did bomb NY. In 2001. n/t

[Clark2008]

12. Good point.

But I don't think it was as a result of McVeigh.

[radar]

7. Geez Louise...

...People wonder about the Hitler comparisons - or why the german population didn't object to the guys rule?

Here we have the admin's propaganda arm asking for approval to bomb civilians. (Cause who really lives outside a combat zone? Why, non-combatants of course!)

Lovely sarcasm

[rpannier]

8. My problem with their question is

"suspected"
I think people are missing that part.

[Bush_Eats_Beef]

10. No, I don't think they misses it, I think they "trust" our president...

...to always "do the right thing."

And we can see how well THAT'S worked out, eh?



:silly:

[still_one]

11. that is what iraq was all about

a war based on a lie

screw cnn, I will not watch them or any other mainstream media, or go to their web site.