Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

13 words vs 16 words

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 10:17 AM
Original message
13 words vs 16 words
http://www.politicalgateway.com/main/columns/read.html?col=356

"People lost their lives. People are dead," Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said, referring to at least 15 people who died in protests in Afghanistan following the Koran disclosures. "People need to be very careful about what they say, just as they need to be careful about what they do."

"It's appalling that this story got out there," intoned Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

State Department spokesman Richard Boucher was also appalled, he said, that "an article that was unfounded to begin with has caused so much harm, including loss of life."

Appalling, indeed. Except for the fact that this "article," this "story," was neither. It was 13 words, with no further elaboration or mention, referring to several allegations under investigation by the Army, including many already made public and not denied -- such as female interrogators stripping in front of detainees and wiping fake menstrual blood on their faces.

It was, specifically, this part of one sentence listing what Newsweek reported as new allegations:

"Interrogators, in an attempt to rattle suspects, flushed a Koran down the toilet ..."

Now compare those 13 words -- and the harm done, including loss of life -- to these 16:

"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

Oh, the irony! This administration is killing me with their stupidity. And what is even more shocking is the number of people that trust these con-men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. ,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEIL PRESIDENT GOD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. If someone alleged something against you and me
And it was lurid enough, every paper in the country would report it and we would not be able to do a goddam thing about it--zip, nada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. You've gotta be SHITTIN' ME!!!!!!!!
Rumsfeld: "People need to be very careful about what they say, just as they need to be careful about what they do."


Ari: "..There are reminders to all Americans that they need to watch what they say, watch what they do, and this is not a time for remarks like that. There never is."


This administration just wants everyone to shut the fuck up. Sorry, I am not about to accomodate their request.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. "It's appalling that this story got out there,"
No, it's appalling that the people would do this.

It's reporting the facts that, to this group, is appalling.

Don't mind that the higher-ups were saying last week that this wasn't the reason all those people were rioting . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC