Craig3410
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 11:27 AM
Original message |
So, what's the minimum requirement to run for the House of Representatives |
|
I know there's an age limit, but is there anything else?
|
fertilizeonarbusto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message |
|
an IQ below forty, obviously ;)
|
ewagner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
That's only for the Republican Primary :evilgrin:
|
fertilizeonarbusto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
I stand corrected :evilgrin:
|
smoogatz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 11:29 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I'm not sure, but I think you have to be a primate |
|
I could be wrong about that, though. Lower forms of life seem fairly commonplace on Capitol Hill.
|
ewagner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 11:29 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I think any other qualifications other than American Citizenship and a minimum age (age of majority I think) are unconstitutional.....
can't require certain educational level, experience or anything like that.....
|
aden_nak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 11:29 AM
Response to Original message |
4. "Lack of Ethics" is not required but strongly preferred. |
ClassWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message |
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message |
7. A couple of kajillion dollars. |
|
What other qualification should one have to help run our nation?
|
oneold1-4u
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Will be running on a "beans for dinner" ticket! "Beans and bacon" would be good but bacon is now priced out of reach for millions and is not a commodity at the food bank! I would willingly help anyone who would run on this ticket. Beans are still an old favorite left from many days in the 30s and 40s.
|
davepc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Clause 2: No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen. http://www.house.gov/Constitution/Constitution.html
|
Nordmadr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. The way that reads it seems to me it says |
|
you can NOT live inthe state you represent. "Shall NOT...be an inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen". Emphasis mine. Am I reading that wrong or what? Clearly it doesn't make sense.
Olaf
|
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. Starts out "no person |
|
so it's a double negative. But you had me scared for a second!
|
Nordmadr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. Thanks for clearing that up. It makes sense as I read it now but |
|
twice before I had seen it and said, now that doesn't seem to make sense. Perhaps a rewording would be appropriate.
Olaf
|
Lydia Leftcoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Section II, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution: |
|
"No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen."
In other words, you have to be at least 25, you have to have been a U.S. citizen for seven years, and you have to live in the state that you represent.
I found that in 30 seconds with Google. :-)
|
oneold1-4u
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. Google manditory in school |
|
That type of knowledge used to be known by every high schooler.
|
PurityOfEssence
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 12:25 PM
Response to Original message |
15. MUST have a religion, should have spouse, children and pet |
|
Okay, the Constitution guarantees that religion shouldn't be a means test for holding office, but look at the stats here: out of 435 Representatives and 100 Senators, there is not one agnostic or atheist. EVERY one of them has a professed religious belief, and I'd be very surprised if there's ANYWHERE in this country where a non-believer could win. Lest we forget, some of the more liberal enclaves are still quite religious. (The backwoods Nazis would be absolutely shocked to see how many churches there are in Berkeley...)
Since somewhere around 15% of the population professes no religious affiliation, and at least 10% are some form of "non-believer", by statistics, we should have EIGHTY, count 'em, EIGHTY legislators who aren't publicly signed on to some organized supernatural certainty.
There have been open homosexuals in office; they're less scary than the heathens.
Lawdy, I are so oppressed...
Then there's that money stuff.
|
johnaries
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Must have hair (or toupee) that does not move, even in high winds. |
paineinthearse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. That is grounds to remove DeLay! |
|
I saw a photo here a couple weeks ago. He was standing on a tarmac wtih his hair blowing staight up.
|
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-26-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
19. Plasticized JFK hair. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 01:13 AM
Response to Original message |