Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ROLLCALL on Bolton Cloture... here's the #'s

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 06:55 PM
Original message
ROLLCALL on Bolton Cloture... here's the #'s
Edited on Thu May-26-05 06:56 PM by dweller
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 109th Congress - 1st Session
as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate
Vote Summary
Question: On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Nomination of John R. Bolton, of Maryland, to be
Representative of the U.S. to the United Nations )
Vote Number: 129
Vote Date: May 26, 2005, 06:17 PM
Required For Majority: 3/5
Vote Result: Cloture Motion Rejected
Nomination Number:
PN326
Nomination Description:
John Robert Bolton, of Maryland, to be the Representative of the United States of
America to the United Nations, with the rank and status of Ambassador, and the
Representative of the United States of America in the Security Council of the United
Nations

Vote Counts:
YEAs
56
NAYs
42
Not Voting
2

YEAs ---56
Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Allen (R-VA)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burns (R-MT)
Burr (R-NC)
Chafee (R-RI)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Coleman (R-MN)
Collins (R-ME)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dole (R-NC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Roberts (R-KS)
Santorum (R-PA)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Stevens (R-AK)
Sununu (R-NH)
Talent (R-MO)
Thomas (R-WY)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)

AYs ---42
Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Clinton (D-NY)
Conrad (D-ND)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Frist (R-TN)
Harkin (D-IA)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Obama (D-IL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wyden (D-OR)

Not Voting - 2
Inouye (D-HI)
Specter (R-PA)

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00129#position

:toast:

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. The web link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlyvi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Why did Frist vote Nay?
What are we being set up for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Frist voted nay? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. He voted LAST the thing was already decided when it was 41 nay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. by voting no
he can file a motion to reconsider
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Procedural
He switched his vote to No at the end so he can move to reconsider next week. Had he voted Aye tonight, he couldn't have. It was all procedure.

Like Kerry's votes that got hung around his neck last year...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. It looks screwed
up! I kept checking to see what I was reading wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. it's procedural
Edited on Thu May-26-05 07:03 PM by dweller
edit: what they said.


dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. And Voinovich voted
Edited on Thu May-26-05 07:03 PM by zidzi
yay for bolton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pinboy Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. He voted as he said he would...
FOR cloture; but he intends to vote AGAINST Bolton when the nomination itself comes to a vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Inouye (D-HI)
Boy he's been a disappointment lately

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. that's 3 he's missed
wonder what's up with him?

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoJoWorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I am wondering if Inouye is ill
I think this might be the case, as he has not voted, and I think he would have
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angryinoville Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Voinovich,Nelson and Pryor voted yea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Don't forget Landrieu!
And to think people were touting her as a running mate for Kerry on many boards. Ugh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MeDeMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. makes no sense at all
Voinovich votes YEA;

Frist votes NAYE;

McCain comes out saying Bolton is the tough & right man for the job, at a time when our credibility is at historic lows and everyone who has worked for, or with, Bolton labels him a "serial abuser".

Meanwhile there isn't a squeak about Galloway's testimony that exposes the fact that the admin basically fabricated the whole "Oil for food scandal", trumped up charges against Kofi's kid and other enemies of the admin, since Kofi called the iraqi war illegal.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. You guys aren't getting it. IT IS A VOTE FOR CLOTURE...limiting debate
some of it wanna get on with it and vote against the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. They want to vote against a guy who is going to pass the vote!
They need to get this document out about him and need time (if anything will help expose it). A vote today would have meant Bolton was in. And they all knew it. Yes, it was a vote for or against cloture, but allowing the full Senate vote today would have brought this freak into the UN forthwith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. It's also a message to the WH to quit circle jerking the Senate
This WH thinks it can do anything and
get away with it and so far it has...
if the Senators want to keep some semblance
of power in that branch, there really
has to be some brakes in this confirmation.

I think the guy has a good future in
white collar crime. The bar is so much
lower in this administration, just shuffling
the crooks around.

I am very disappointed in Senator Landrieu...
hope she can see that Bolton is just one
of the chefs in the cooking of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Pryor says he's a born again Christian and I believe him.
So Sen. Pryor, how do you justify voting for a guy who lies, harasses staff of either gender, and whose wife left him after she says he forced her to participate on group sex.

I just don't get these people who claim to be so Godly all the time. Why don't they act that way? Because, Pryor is totally FOS (full of shit), that's why.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
15. Lie-berman voted with the Dems?
OMFG!!!!!!!

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MeDeMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-26-05 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. QUIK, grab something fast...
we are about to be hit by a quake of shattering proportions.

Wait a minute, isn't Lie-b a Dem ? even if it doesn't seem that way most of the time.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC