Question: Miller has a WH source separate and apart from Cooper's?

[Lex]

Cooper's WH source released him to talk to the grand jury, but Miller's didn't?

Is this right?

[janx]

1. It's not clear at this point.

But there do seem to be (from all accounts) multiple "leakers."

[Lex]

4. Wouldn't it be nice if *TWO* senior WH staff went down for this?

Even the lapdog press might be interested in that.

[Sydnie]

2. I don't think Miller said either way

but the reports say that there are TWO sources, so maybe hers is different?

My money is still on Bolton as the originator of the information.

[shraby]

3. Yup, Cooper's did, Miller's didn't.

Unless Miller's did and she didn't admit it.

[Frances]

6. If Miller's did release her, then I think she would testify

If Miller's source is the same as Cooper's, then it would be silly for Miller not to testify.

I think Bolton is a likely candidate because he has so much to lose. Maybe the reason the WH won't release all of the Bolton documents is that there is a clue about this.

On the other hand, wouldn't it be ironic if the leaker was Bush or Cheney?

[dave502d]

5. Did Cooper say WH source?

[Lex]

7. Well, the "WH" part is just speculation.

Wasn't it Cooper's notes that Lawrence O'Donnell said named Rove?

[Roland99]

8. Karen Hughes involved in this?

[Lex]

9. Oh, that would be nice if she were.

She makes me sick. :puke: