Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CAFTA -- the symbolic victory we need

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
idlisambar Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 02:43 AM
Original message
CAFTA -- the symbolic victory we need
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 02:44 AM by idlisambar
In substance, CAFTA in the overall scheme is insignificant. Certainly less significant than NAFTA, and far less significant than the very serious issues we face with our East Asian trading partners.

Nonetheless, the defeat of CAFTA would be a huge symbolic lift for those of us who want to change US trade policy. It's defeat will stir discussion in the media much like Seattle did in 99' and make life that much more difficult for "Washington Consensus" politicians.

The defeat of this trade bill will not derail neo-liberalism but it is a start. The unfortunate truth is that the U.S. has become so hollowed out of industry that at this point that even the most drastic changes in trade policy cannot stop the eventual reckoning. A currency collapse and subsequent sharp decline in America's living standards and economic power is inevitable at this point. Still, we can still hope that out of this weakness the U.S. will learn the right lessons and emerge with greater strengh in the long run.

This is why CAFTA must be defeated. We need to put it in our Democratic elected representatives minds that a vote for free trade is a vote against Democratic values. Our representatives must be held accountable for these votes. The best chance we have to emerge with strength is to shift the Democratic party away the "Washington Consensus". If the Democratic party is able to make this transformation it will be well positioned to pick up the mantle of leadership just as it did in the 1930's. If on the other hand the party is caught flat-footed, and is full of doctrinaire free traders as it is now, Democrats will be poorly positioned. It is then likely that a emergent third-party, with an uncertain political agenda, will take advantage of the political vacuum during the period of economic turmoil.

Perhaps even more importantly it is important to encourage politicians of all stripes to be less doctrinaire in the views on economic policy. It is not clear that the current generation of leaders has the first idea of how to build and maintain a strong economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. regional note: the Bushies are so obsessed with getting CAFTA passed
that they effectively blackmailed Salvadorans into reelecting the ARENA(death squad party)government by threatening to forbid Salvadorenos working in the U.S. from sending home remittance money
if the election didn't come out the way the Bushies wanted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToeBot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is there some sort of time limit on when this must come to a vote?
If not, I can't see the Republicans taking a chance by bringing it to the floor until they have the votes locked up. It seems this has been in play for along time now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idlisambar Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Could be next week
Cafta vote next week, lawmaker says
Rep. Thomas pledges to work to change textile provisions

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - The House of Representatives is likely to vote next week on a controversial trade pact between the United States and Central American countries, the chamber's top trade lawmaker said Tuesday.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%7BE50A211B-380F-4DF7-BB5F-61C5E9BE03A4%7D&siteid=google
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. I predict our representatives will fail us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idlisambar Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. one more kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC