Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

James Moore (Huffington Post): Why Karl Rove Will Never Go

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 02:50 AM
Original message
James Moore (Huffington Post): Why Karl Rove Will Never Go
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/archive/jim-moore/why-karl-rove-will-never-_4367.html

Just look down the block to see why he won't leave President Bush or why he will not be asked to clean out his West Wing desk. In the foreground, the president is trying to salvage some element of the Social Security reform plan, and select Supreme Court justices and manage the political debate over their confirmation. Those are both Rove's job. For Republicans to retain their control of congress, Rove has to remain at work picking candidates, raising money, and developing campaign strategies for congressional and senate candidates for 2006. Retaining majority control is critical to the Rove and Bush plan to set up America for decades of GOP guidance. And when Rove indicated, during a moment of weakness at the end of the last campaign, that he was interested in stepping back from presidential electoral politics, he was advised by his client the president that he needed to hang around and execute the long term master plan for GOP takeover. If Rove goes away, the Republican dream dies.

There is a notion that Rove's continued occupation of his White House office will make the president a target and do long term damage to Mr. Bush's credibility. This leads to the coffee shop conjecture that the party will pressure Mr. Bush to send Karl away until the temperature cools on the Potomac. Not gonna happen. Ken Mehlman's entire career, for instance, is a Karl Rove creation and Mehlman is not exactly going to urge the president to move Rove out of the large white building. And, even though congressional members may begin to worry about how their support of Rove is harming them in their home districts, how can they ever push very hard to ditch the guy who took them to the prom? They can't. They won't.

So where is it going? This is in the hands of an able prosecutor, a man whose reputation is apolitical and whose performance in the criminal justice system is a good reason to retain one's faith in the way our democracy works. Patrick Fitzgerald has gone after terrorists and politicians with equal fervor. And his only standard has been the law. If an act of treason or perjury has been committed, there will likely be indictments. But that won't change anything with Bush and Rove. Their fates are inseperable. They are two heads on the same body. If you cut one, they both bleed.

Karl Rove has worked his entire life to reach a point of power where he can change the American political landscape for a generation. Unless something changes, however, his narrative line is shaping up as a Greek tragedy with Democrats singing the chorus in the background. Rove's anger at a former diplomat's opinion piece in a newspaper may destroy all that he has dreamed. And if it does, it will ruin more than just a political operative. A president will likely come to grief. And disaffected Americans, made cynical by the failures of their government and its elected leaders, will find one more reason to disengage from the democratic process. And that's the reason we all ought to be worried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Actually, the answer is simpler than that
This is an administration that never does anything they don't want to do unless there is absolutely no alternative. They never admit mistakes or wrongdoing. Firing Karl Rove would be an admission of wrongdoing, and this administration (in its collective mind, at least) is never wrong. Of course, if Rove does get indicted, he'll get thrown overboard. But we've got a long way to go before it reaches that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think Moore's closing statement concerns me the most...
Much of the commentary here on DU centers around "disaffected Americans, made cynical by the failures of their government and its elected leaders"...and until the people in government who are responsible for those failures are gone, it will get worse before it gets better. This "lifelong dream of lifelong control" that Rove's got is not the American dream.

You're right, when Bush runs out of alternatives, he takes action.

I called in to the Guy James show on Saturday and spoke to him about the "Purple Heart Band-Aid" debacle during the election...how Bush sat back, watched it happen, made no comment, just let the crap storm fly all around him while he stayed "on message" and smirked his way through the day.

I don't see the Rove situation as being different. He's going to hope that his apathy will mutate into the public losing interest. Patrick Fitzgerald will do what he can. But if Rove walks away from this one, I would anticipate an aggressive pursuit of the "agenda" and the GOP facilitating his ascent to sainthood.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorFlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. If the shrub wants to continue to operate with the Roveian anchor
around his neck, it's fine by me. I'd kind of like to see the 2006 midterm elections be a referendum on Rove. Just thinking out loud . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. That works for me, too. Rove as a millstone around Bush's neck
during the 2006 elections. That's a pretty picture. But I bet Rove will quit "to spend more time with his family" before then. He would have been encouraged to leave before this, but Bush is in such dire need of a brain that Rove has been nearly indispensable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorFlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Unfortunately, Rove is gonna have to go; even the rethugs understand
that. If the shrub does the stupid thing and keeps him around, several rethugs are gonna be unemployed.

Shrubbie do something stupid? How out of character . . .

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC