Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1972 Election question...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush loves Jiang Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:48 AM
Original message
1972 Election question...
Edited on Mon Jan-26-04 01:49 AM by Bush loves Jiang
Weren't McGovern and Shriver both military men?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snyttri Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Mcgovern was the principal figure in a book by Stephen Ambrose but the
campaign chose to play it down. Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. If what you're getting at
does military experience count with republicans - McCain was far more qualified than georgie porgie - "when the boys came out to play, georgie porgie ran away"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathleen04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Who said anything about Republicans?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush loves Jiang Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Well that too...
But I mainly posted this to warn people not to get over-confident if Kerry or Clark win the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I agree that
the military record thing is being overemphasized. It didn't do McCain any good - "its the economy stupid." The war has been important up until now, but Bush is determined to pull out of Iraq before the elections - July 1 if he can - because he considers it a looming vote liability and it will effectively quash the anti war thing. I think the bigger real issue is how the war has affected the deficit and projected continual drain on resources that could be used for domestic social issues. Dean is speaking to this in a common sense kind of way, and is getting beat up because he does not do it in the run of the mill fillibuster style policitospeak. I wish people could begin to see through the smoke and mirrors to the real issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathleen04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. I believe Shriver
was Director of the Peace Corps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. McGovern certainly was
I don't remember about Shriver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ma4t Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. of course he was
Shriver was a Sargent. (Sorry, I just couldn't resist that one.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. McGovern was a war hero
McGovern was a war hero in WWII, but decided to completely deemphasize his military background in 1972. One of his many campaign errors, I believe. If he talked more about how "war is hell" from actual experience it would have helped. Ironically, Nixon was a Quaker, who was a noncombatant officer in WWII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwenos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. McGovern Flew B-17's
1972 was the first election I voted in. If memory serves, George McGovern flew missions in B17's over Europe. Dont' know how many. Real man's ballsey stuff, if you know anything about the history.

It is one of the sad ironies of the Democratic Party in the last thirty years that McGovern, a courageous warrior, got tagged with the "wimp" image. Nixon, a Navy veteran, never made a big deal about his service in the Pacific (afraid of unflattering comparisons with JFK's heroics), but most all of those WW2 generation guys served.

But, then, look what Rove/Iago's kneecappers did to Max Cleland in Georgia.

Shameful. Shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Nixon played poker in the Navy and never saw action
I think his base was strafed once or twice, but that's about it. McGovern, on the other hand, flew B-17's over the Third Reich. But in 1972 Nixon was portrayed as the American hero and McGovern was the commie pinko leftist wimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hey2370 Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. Was that before or after Custer and Little Big Horn?
This reminds of Dean talking about McKinley, Coolidge, the Roosevelts and Hoover in his stump speech.

The crowd always gets really quiet, like everyone is hoping Professor Dean doesn't call on them.

"Damn, I knew I should have studied last night! Pssst! Who is Coolidge? I didn't know there was gonna be a pop quiz!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. McGovern was an anti-war candidate with a distinguished war record
So are John Kerry and Wes Clark. Frankly, I don't think Kerry's military record will help him expand his base all that much, especially since he was so closely identified with the anti-war movement, having been a leader of Vietnam veterans against the war.

I'm beginning to have my doubts about Wes Clark too. I really don't know why he's surrounding himself with people like George McGovern and Michael Moore. Perhaps he's just trying to prove his Democratic bona fides. But frankly I think things may have gone too far.

In any event, if a charismatic draft dodger from the South like Bill Clinton can beat war heroes like George Bush Sr. and Bob Dole, then I think John Edwards, a son of a mill worker, can beat the son of a president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's 2004,
Not 1972.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC