Chicago Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 11:31 AM
Original message |
| Poll question: Who is gonna win the Aug 2 Special Election in Ohio? |
|
Give me your non-biased opinion:
|
| Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. I chose to be optimistic, ... |
|
... but I really won't know until tomorrow night. I hope the low turnout will favor our side.
|
| BillZBubb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Being realistic, the Repug woman. |
|
That part of Ohio is pretty red, even their baseball team is the Reds. The sheeple still haven't caught on.
|
| NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. I think Bush got over 60% or more of the vote... so... |
|
so, if Hackett loses 54-46 or 52-48, is it a good sign?
|
| kcass1954
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Who should win? Paul Hackett, of course! |
|
Who will get the most votes? I'm not sure. I hope it's Paul Hackett, but who knows.
Who will "win"? Unless they've "fixed" the election system in Ohio, Jean Schmitt will pull through.
|
| Al-CIAda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. The rigged machines, of course. nt |
| gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. It'll probably be unclean Jean |
|
But if she gets less than 55% of the vote, I'd say that the leadership in the Democratic party ought to take another look at what it considers "safe" congressional districts for the Republicans.
|
| Chicago Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. We have no chance you think? |
| tibbir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. I chose Hackett because I just want him to win so bad |
|
but I seriously don't give him much of a chance in that part of Ohio and with the electronic vote factor.
|
| Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. How easy are those machines to re-rig after 2004? |
|
With new candidates, wouldn't the vote rigging have to be reset somehow?
:shrug:
|
| ElsewheresDaughter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. VERY EASY...just 51 - 49 flip ...watch this video |
|
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 02:06 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
|
| Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 11. Sorry, no sound card. |
|
Is it something that must be done at the local level? If so, it might be difficult as the county boards of election monitor that sort of thing with bipartisan members.
|
| Connie_Corleone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. I'm going to say Hackett. |
|
You would think it would be Hackett, considering how corrupt Schmidt is. But, this part of Ohio is so friggin' republican, they would vote for a leech if it had an (R) behind it's name. Too bad I'm in district 1.
|
| Chicago Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
