Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In 2003, John Roberts voted against the "rare arroyo southwestern toad"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:43 AM
Original message
In 2003, John Roberts voted against the "rare arroyo southwestern toad"
Toad case may reveal Roberts' philosophy
Appeals court vote may show inclination toward states' rights

Monday, August 1, 2005; Posted: 11:27 p.m. EDT (03:27 GMT)

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A toad may offer insight into John Roberts' legal philosophy.

The Supreme Court nominee voted against the amphibian in a 2003 case testing the powers of the federal government.

In that case, Roberts suggested that federal power is limited, urging the court to reconsider its decision restricting a San Diego area construction project because it encroached on the habitat of the rare arroyo southwestern toad.

He questioned whether "a hapless toad that, for reasons of its own, lives its entire life" in one state could be regulated by the federal government. His view did not prevail.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. But a useless asshole from Texas gets into the White House...
based on the criminal manipulations of his useless brother in Florida based on a Supreme Court decision with no precendent that sets no precedent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. This Doesnt Help Our Cause
At all. In fact, most of America will see this as laughable.

The "Rare Aroyo Southwestern Toad" stops John Roberts! :wtf: Is what they'll say...

I know what you mean, but the majority of Americans won't be able to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed...the slant of the article is what's important...and...
ALSO will be missed by most Americans. They're just using the incident as a means to illustrate his thought process, but Bush will just keep leaning on the "he's a GOOD man who won't legislate from the bench" rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Add to that anger over med marijuana & emminent domain...
...and it makes the argument that Roberts is dangerous because he wants to limit the scope of federal power that much tougher to argue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly.
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 11:54 AM by BamaLefty
But telling rural Alabama that John Roberts isn't a friend of rare southwestern toads will make them fall in love with him.

They will interpret that article that way. Believe me, they TRY to be fill their mind with BS. They long for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I agree....
...the mentality will be "Wow what a sensible judge, ruling against those darn treehuggers upset over some stinking toad"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. "for reasons of its own" HA!
the toad picked the San Diego area, just like millions of immigrants from all over the world. Makes me laugh :-).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC