We are getting two DIFFERENT sets of numbers!

[MelissaB]

US HOUSE Ohio 2nd Dist
753 precincts of 753 reporting
JEAN SCHMIDT 57,974 52%
PAUL HACKETT 54,401 48%


http://www.wcpo.com/news/2005/local/08/02/election_results.html



Schmidt 59,095
Hackett 55,091

100% precincts

Link: http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050802/NEWS01/308020015/0/CINCI

[Dinger]

1. Well Paul, Are Ya In A Fightin' Mood?

Bet ya are - go for it!

[aquart]

2. Provisionals?

[Mz Pip]

3. Damn humidity

Gums up the works. :sarcasm:

Mz Pip
:dem:

[GetTheRightVote]

4. Not surprised !!!

:kick:

[kwolf68]

5. Likely a script

Certain scripts run at certain times, a Web based screen shot means nothing. Dont drive yourself insane over this...Clermont was far-right this morning and its still far right...Lets move on.

[MelissaB]

7. Well, should the numbers not match?

[Guaranteed]

27. The question is, how can 1800 more votes come in after

753 out of 753 precincts have reported?

[dweller]

9. you first.

or you can keep giving the same advice on OH-2 threads...

dp

[kwolf68]

18. Ill give advice because

This whining about fraud in a right-wing county that was going to deliver this election is detracting from the real issue...

That we had a man go into right-wing turf and make a game out of it. I don't think we'll ever win these districts, but take that game to a moderate district...where a republican resides...and get them out of the US House.

Let's face it...Some districts aren't going DEM (and some wont go Rep)...we had Tom DeLay on the ropes last year...he is basically a proven criminal, a compulsive liar, and embarrassment, and clinically insane and he still got 60% of the vote. No fraud was needed there and none was needed here.

Per your advice I'll move on and no longer mention how ridiculous fraud claims are in this case.

[dweller]

25. F R A U D is the real issue.

and 'move on' was your advice. I was just suggesting you follow it yourself.

dp

[Carolab]

12. You're wrong about screen shots. We've got some from November

that STILL haven't been explained and are going to soon be the basis for an audit.

So don't assume that screen shots don't tell tales.

[MelissaB]

16. Thank you, Carolab!

:loveya:

[mconvente]

19. well, then save em.

I'll keep them but we need a lot of people to keep them.

[mconvente]

6. I've got screens

EVERYONE save those.

[MelissaB]

11. THANK YOU!

[BamaLefty]

13. How Can This Be Explained???

The humidity? :eyes:

[aquart]

20. I don't know how to save screens.

[dweller]

23. in windows

hit alt-print screen

paste in word, or paint.

dp

[meganmonkey]

22. Right on - thanks for getting these!

:thumbsup:

[yankeefanatic3]

8. FISHY NT

[wli]

10. likely rigged

Really flaky reporting patterns, bailed out at the last minute by delayed reporting from the last precinct(s)... very likely rigged.

[Ice4Clark]

14. How about 3 sets of numbers? You can add these to the

collection:

from Hamilton County website:

Hackett 55,151

Schmidt 59,132

[GreenPartyVoter]

15. I wonder why?

-------------------------------------------------------
Fight for election reform! Fight for Andy!
http://timeforachange.bluelemur.com/electionreform.htm

[starmaker]

17. Final 13883 votes 59/41

With lower set of #'s

[bufffbison]

21. another set of numbers

DEM - PAUL HACKETT 55151 48.25%
REP - JEAN SCHMIDT 59132 51.74%

these numbers were reported at 10:54:01 PM


http://www.hamilton-co.org/boe/inputdata/Electionsresults/Realtime/RealTime.pdf

[skids]

24. It's not the HUMIDITY, it's the STUPIDITY

Fraud or no, and I'm not saying no quite yet, why can't we expect people who are payed to do so to get their acts together and come up with a consistant count?

[kitkat65]

26. From wcpo screen capture

Last Updated 10:50 p.m.

662 precinct of 753 reporting

Jean Schmidt 49,681 50%
Paul Hackett 48,811 50%

[Guaranteed]

28. It could have something to do with early voting or absentee ballots. nt

[MelissaB]

29. New link for results

http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050802/NEWS01/308020014/0/CINCI


The second link wasn't working.