yankeefanatic3
(256 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-03-05 11:29 PM
Original message |
Election fraud: We need to have this discussion right now |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-03-05 11:44 PM by yankeefanatic3
As far as I'm concerned, the Clermont County results were suspicious last night. How the right thing happened at the right time, the "humidity" struck -- 9,451 votes were added for Schmidt, etc. So, as far as the counties are concerned, Southern Ohio is being targetted by terrorists (Warren County) and the abominable humidity (Clermont).
I think we're on to something more than anyone else. But I have a serious concern. We are always very quick to call foul and fraud in elections nowadays, and yes, while we have good reason to, it only feeds into the Republican argument that we are supporting "conspiracy theories." Let's face it, every time we yell "fraud," we just feed that theory.
Of course, the "liberal media" isn't going to help us out. We need to figure out a way to get the voting reform message out there. By the 2006 elections, if voting isn't reformed, starting today -- we must find out how we can expose the fraud that clearly is existing.
I wonder what Southern Ohio's excuse will be this time...The poll watchers' gum made the ballots stick together?
Let's start the movement right now.
|
madfloridian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-03-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Dean said today on Randi's show that they are looking into it. |
|
He agreed it was suspicious.
|
yankeefanatic3
(256 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-03-05 11:36 PM
Original message |
|
Because the only way this is no longer a "conspiracy theory" is if we expose it.
|
Carolab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-03-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I was wondering when Howard would start to say that.
Good Lord, that DNC report was a total joke.
And, after Bev Harris went on TV with Howard and DEMONSTRATED how easy it is to hack an election!
|
Carolab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-03-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message |
2. You'll find lots of people in the "movement" over here in our forum. |
Corey_Baker08
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-03-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I Think you mean Election Fraud? |
|
I said Voter fraud once and got chewed out about it, its election fraud.
|
yankeefanatic3
(256 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-03-05 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Okay, topic changed n/t |
wli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-03-05 11:43 PM
Response to Original message |
5. election fraud, not voter fraud |
|
"Voter fraud" is voters trying to vote twice, illegal immigrants trying to vote, and so on. It's been used to hijack the legitimate DOJ investigative teams and set up a parallel Federalist Society -staffed team dedicated to purging voter rosters instead of doing anything about the neocons rigging elections.
You need to say "election fraud." And to be very clear about it.
|
kansasblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-03-05 11:45 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Election Fraud ! The voter didn't do the fraud |
|
at the very least call it "voting" fraud.
When the Republican 'fix' the problem they work on "voter fraud" and make rules to help stop voters from voting twice and then try to pass that off as making things better. Don't fall in their trap. Don't blame the voter. ELECTION FRAUD please!
Thanks
|
GetTheRightVote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-04-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message |
8. It does look bad when they shut things done again for heat ?? |
|
Something smells to me.
:kick:
|
election_2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-04-05 01:51 AM
Response to Original message |
9. How about an official day for action? - Nov. 2, 2005 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Apr 20th 2024, 03:17 AM
Response to Original message |