Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rummy wants to use landmines again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:21 PM
Original message
Rummy wants to use landmines again

(they probably already have)

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0803-06.htm


After 10-Year Hiatus, Pentagon Eyes New Landmine

- The George W. Bush administration may soon resume production of antipersonnel land mines in a move that is at odds with both the international community and previous U.S. policy on the weapons, says a leading human rights organization.

In December of this year, the Pentagon will decide whether or not to begin producing a new type of antipersonnel land mine called a ”Spider”. The first of these mines would then be scheduled to roll out in early 2007.

According to Human Rights Watch (HRW), the funds for Spider's production are already earmarked, as the Pentagon has requested 1.3 billion dollars for the mine system, as well as for another mine called the Intelligent Munitions System, which is expected to be fully running by 2008.

A new report by the HRW issued Wednesday notes these weapons that kill and maim an estimated 500 people, mostly civilians, each week. The group called on the Bush administration to halt all research and development on all types of these widely-banned weapons
-snip-
------------------------------------


anyone in america that works at a plant that makes landmines is a traitor to humanity

(we already know the owners of the plant are)

whose going to stop Rummy? whose going to stop the big, bad bushgang?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who makes the land mines?
I've come to the conclusion that every single wrong thing like this they want to implement is most likely tied to the Carlyle Group or some similar investing company.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. ATK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. ...
Edited on Thu Aug-04-05 12:36 PM by ArkDem

Spider
Spider is an advanced, man-in-the-loop, area denial munition. It will protect the warfighter by laying down either a lethal or non-lethal field of fire yet puts complete command and control in the hands of the soldier. Spider offers remotely controlled force protection while enhancing the operational and tactical flexibility of forces in the field.

Spider gives U.S. forces an unmatched capability for perimeter defense and flank protection. It can be used for offensive or defensive engagements. Spider systems can be easily recovered and readied for a new deployment if they have not been fired.

After the battle is over, Spider systems will deactivate so that they do not pose a threat or residual hazard. Not only is a soldier in complete control of the munition at all times, the soldier can select to engage the enemy with individual munitions rather than the entire system and can chose lethal or non-lethal options.

Spider is being developed by ATK with its joint venture partner Textron.

http://www.atk.com/AdvancedWeaponSystems/advanceweaponsystems_barriersystems.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. more like a claymore than a landmine
if it is indeed a controlled munition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. totally safe if abandoned?
In addition, IMS meets all requirements of the National Landmine Policy and provides interoperable control of the Spider antipersonnel landmine alternative.

An initial operational capability is planned to be available in 2009.

http://www.atk.com/AdvancedWeaponSystems/advanceweaponsystems_barriersystems.asp

Let's not get all knee jerk here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. In the mean time we will continue to use the old m14 mines
which will work for many decades. Which is better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. This spider seems more like a remote controlled firearm than a mine....
dunno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Like we need more dead civilians from landmines...
There are still thousands of undetonated landmines around the world mostly concentrated in Africa and East Asia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Ever heard the saying about 'taking a horse to water'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, yes, many times
BUT IT'S SO FRICKIN' FRUSTRATING!! ARGH!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC