Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Swift-Bloat Drudgers Against Mom's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ArthurRuger Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 11:47 PM
Original message
Swift-Bloat Drudgers Against Mom's
I posted this to my MyDD blog:

The choreographed blitz has begun. So predictable from the pawns while the princes stay in hiding.

The only dramatic element of the Drudge story is the exclamation mark. Everything else is not drama but farce, a blatant snatching of parts of a a woman's pained 2004 account from here and some other parts from there to create the illusion of flip flop.

All in an attempt to rescue our "bring em on!" marionette who in truth is shaming presidential manhood by a pitiful unwillingness to be held accountable for his own words.

Mrs. Sheehan does not exaggerate nor flip flop in telling a truth that swift-bloaters cannot avoid.

George is casual ... way too casual in his ability to project empathy.

George is casual ... way too casual in his inability to express any kind of sincere phrase that reflects a generosity of spirit that he lacks.

Swift-bloaters cannot compensate for that behavior and Sheehan's portrayal of what happened in full historical context of her 2004 encounter with a programmed political stooge resembles nothing constructed out of the drudge sludge that was published today.

Many of us who made a voting decision in 2000 saw that shallow lack of empathy immediately. Yet unhampered by the loss of a loved one in a moment when one seeks nobility and reason for a loss, we have yet to find ourselves looking to Bush for validation of such a terrible loss.

In 2004 a lot more than 34% of the wise electorate was willing to trust the sincerity that was never there.

In 2005 even one word from his lips generates a suspicion of lying and disinformation, no expectation of consoling from the man who lied to get us there, to get our troops into a turkey shoot and who can't find words to console because he flat out doesn't have them.

Drudge has a hard row to hoe. The choir he misdirects is shrinking.

Smearing the mother of a dead soldier is an act of desperation his prompters have no courage to take ... not when they can find someone dumb or desperate enough to do it for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Like they smeared an Iraqi
Vet, Paul Hackett..me thinks they're going one smear over the top and even the sheeple aren't going to hear their cries anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. all those support numbers were fabricated, even Gallup & exit polls
He never had anywhere near that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gemini Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Smearing the dead soldier's mother is one of the most
Edited on Tue Aug-09-05 01:01 AM by Confound W
cowardly acts in a long queue of cowardly acts.
The swift bloaters and the rest of the cowards including the coward in crawford, are finding themselves sinking in the shit of public opinion. It's about time.

Welcome to DU Arthur!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC