Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Great American Jobs Scam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sepia_steel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 12:39 PM
Original message
The Great American Jobs Scam
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=12540

http://www.corpwatch.org/

Lurking within the records of most cities and states in America there lies a scandal. A tax scandal. A jobs scandal. A corporate and political scandal.


It's the Great American Jobs Scam: an intentionally constructed system that enables corporations to exact huge taxpayer subsidies by promising quality jobs - and then lets them fail to deliver. The other benefit often promised - higher tax revenues - often proves false or exaggerated as well.

Take for example: New York City, which must hold the record for job blackmail, though it is hardly alone. One study of 80 companies that had received "retention" subsidies from the Big Apple found that at least 39 had later announced major layoffs, or they had entered into large-scale mergers or put themselves up for sale - events that usually trigger mass layoffs. A detailed analysis of 10 subsidized companies found they had a total loss of more than 3,000 jobs.

Bank of America, for example, received two "job retention" subsidies from New York City, in 1993 and in 2004. The 1993 subsidy was given to induce the bank to move employees into the World Trade Center following the 1993 bombing. In exchange for at least $18 million in benefits, the bank promised to retain at least 1,700 jobs in Tower One for 15 years. Instead, it laid off at least 800 people in 1997 after merging with Security Pacific National Bank. This was such a severe drop in employment that the city canceled the subsidy in 1998, but didn't require Bank of America to refund any past subsidies.

After it was displaced by the attacks of September 11, 2001, Bank of America won a new subsidy in 2004 for the consolidation of several offices into a new headquarters building in midtown Manhattan. The deal is supposed to retain 2,995 jobs and create as many new jobs over 25 years. The state and city offered a total package of $82.6 million. The Bank also got $650 million in triple-tax-exempt "Liberty Bonds," special low-interest loans enacted for New York City following the September 11 attacks. But shortly after the deal closed, Bank of America merged with Fleet Bank (which had also received an NYC job-retention subsidy). The new entity announced it would cut a total of 17,000 jobs nationwide. The overall job impact on New York City was unknown as of late 2004.


Scams like this cost taxpayers an estimated $50 billion a year...

(continued...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick. This is an important issue. Let's kick it a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sepia_steel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Walmart is a notorious one
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 12:46 PM by sepia_steel
they are discussed in the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Federal block grants should be based on local contributions...
When state and local governments give away local dollars to corporations, their block grants should be reduced by an equal amount. There's no other way to stop the corporate blackmail -- make it difficult (don't know if it can be made illegal) for local governments to make these deals. They're just freaking stupid.

Couple years back the State of Ohio gave Wal-Mart a multi-million dollar tax subsidy to create a centralize warehouse system. Questions:

1) Why in the hell are working-class taxpayers underwriting the operations of the most profitable corporation on the face of the Earth?

2) Was there some possibility that Wal-Mart would pull out of Ohio if it weren't given the subsidy?

3) Since the centralized warehouse combined several smaller operations (which resulted in "efficiencies" that allowed Wal-Mart to lay off warehouse employees), why in the hell are taxpayers paying to create FEWER jobs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. W2 for Corporations on Welfare
We here in the great Social Darwinism/Free market project (USA) want to know why large companies are such big tax suckers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoFederales Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Who is SUPPOSED to have oversight on this?
NoFederales
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Scam will go with Bush's name in years to come.
I will be 6 feet under and the country will still be trying to find the tax money and all the rest that has left for others pockets in the last 4 and a half years. When we are all poor once more we will watch our tax money better and even Congress may do that.I just know I am right about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oregon gave tax breaks to high-tech companies to move to the state
Some of them, including branches of major multinationals, didn't even last ten years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sepia_steel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. kickiteykick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC